Pune Court Sentences Man to 20 Years for Repeated Sexual Assault of Minor Cousin
Pune Man Gets 20 Years for Sexual Assault of Minor Cousin

Pune Fast-Track Court Delivers 20-Year Sentence in Minor Sexual Assault Case

A fast-track court in Pune has delivered a landmark verdict, convicting and sentencing a 28-year-old casual worker to 20 years of rigorous imprisonment for the repeated sexual assault of his 14-year-old cousin. The judgment, pronounced by Special Judge Aniruddha Gandhi on Monday, underscores the stringent application of child protection laws in India.

Court Rejects Defense, Upholds Minor's Testimony

In a powerful statement, Judge Gandhi declared, "The survivor is a minor and the consent of a minor is no consent at all." The court firmly held that even if the sexual intercourse appeared consensual, it constitutes a grave offence under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act and the Indian Penal Code (IPC). This ruling reinforces the legal principle that minors cannot provide valid consent in such matters.

According to public prosecutor Anil Kumar Verma, the victim was a standard VII student when the assaults began in 2021. The accused, who was on visiting terms with the girl's family, subjected her to repeated sexual abuse. The horrific incidents came to light on November 7, 2021, when the girl courageously confided in her mother. Subsequently, an FIR was lodged on November 11 at the Chandannagar police station, initiating a thorough investigation.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Evidence and Trial Proceedings

The prosecution built a robust case based on multiple pillars of evidence. Key testimonies from the survivor, her mother, and her grandmother were presented in court, alongside compelling medical evidence. The court found the girl's account to be consistent and trustworthy, noting that her version was strongly corroborated by other evidence on record.

Defense arguments attempting to discredit the case—citing delays in filing the FIR, absence of specific dates, and alleged inconsistencies—were firmly rejected. The court ruled that such factors were insufficient to undermine the testimony of a minor survivor, emphasizing the sensitivity required in handling cases involving child victims.

Sentencing and Legal Implications

Holding the accused guilty under relevant provisions of the POCSO Act and the IPC, the court imposed the statutory minimum sentence of 20 years of rigorous imprisonment. Additionally, a fine of Rs 25,000 was levied, with the amount directed to be paid to the survivor as compensation. The court also noted that the accused has been in jail since March 6, 2023, and is entitled to set-off for this period.

This verdict highlights the judiciary's commitment to protecting children from sexual exploitation and ensuring swift justice through fast-track mechanisms. It serves as a stern warning against such heinous crimes and reaffirms the legal safeguards in place for minors under Indian law.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration