The Staff Selection Commission (SSC) successfully conducted the Tier 2 examinations for the Combined Graduate Level (CGL) 2025 recruitment cycle on January 17 and January 18, 2025. This crucial phase of the selection process witnessed participation from over 1.39 lakh candidates across the country, who appeared for the examination in two distinct papers.
SSC CGL Tier 2 Answer Key 2025: Anticipated Release and Access
As candidates eagerly await their results, the Commission is expected to upload the final answer keys, individual response sheets, and detailed marks memos for the SSC CGL Tier 2 examination in the near future. All these critical documents will be made available exclusively on the official SSC website – ssc.gov.in. However, it is important to note that as of now, the Staff Selection Commission has not announced an official date for the release of the Tier 2 answer key. Candidates are advised to regularly monitor the official portal for the latest updates and notifications regarding the publication of these essential evaluation materials.
Examination Structure and Paper Pattern for SSC CGL Tier 2
The SSC CGL Tier 2 examination was administered in two phases, corresponding to Paper 1 and Paper 2. Paper 1 was compulsory for all candidates applying for various posts under the CGL recruitment. In a significant update, this paper also incorporated a Data Entry Speed Test (DEST) component to assess typing proficiency. On the other hand, Paper 2 was specifically designed for candidates who applied for the position of Junior Statistical Officer (JSO) within the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, making it a specialized assessment for this role.
Detailed Marking Scheme and Section-wise Breakdown
The Tier-II SSC CGL examination was structured as a single comprehensive paper, conducted in one session with a total duration of two hours and fifteen minutes. The question paper was strategically divided into three distinct sections, each focusing on different skill sets and knowledge areas.
Section I: Mathematical Abilities and Reasoning
- This section comprised two sub-sections: Mathematical Abilities and Reasoning & General Intelligence.
- Each sub-section contained 30 questions, resulting in a total of 60 questions for Section I.
- Every question in this section carried three marks, making the maximum achievable score 180 marks.
Section II: Language Proficiency and Current Affairs Awareness
- This section focused on evaluating language skills and general knowledge.
- It included English Language and Comprehension with 45 questions and General Awareness with 25 questions.
- The total number of questions in Section II was 70.
- Similar to Section I, each question here was worth three marks, leading to a maximum score of 210 marks.
Section III: Computer Knowledge Test
- This section tested the candidates' understanding of basic computer concepts and applications.
- It consisted of 20 questions, with each question valued at three marks.
- The maximum score for Section III was 60 marks.
Revised Normalisation Method for Fair Evaluation
In a notable development for the 2025 examination cycle, the Staff Selection Commission has implemented a revised method of normalisation for tests conducted across multiple shifts. This new normalisation approach is specifically designed to ensure fair and equitable evaluation for all candidates, irrespective of the varying difficulty levels encountered in different examination shifts.
Under this updated system, the traditional reliance on averages and score variations has been replaced. Instead, the key determinant will now be the candidates' ranks or percentiles within their respective shifts. This methodological shift aims to create a more balanced and just assessment framework, addressing long-standing concerns about shift-based disparities in competitive examinations.
As the evaluation process progresses, candidates who appeared for the SSC CGL Tier 2 examination should stay informed through official channels. The release of the final answer key will not only provide clarity on correct responses but also offer insights into the Commission's assessment criteria under the new normalisation policy.
