In a move that has reignited political tensions, new plaques installed at the White House under the portraits of former presidents now carry sharp criticisms of Democratic leaders. The initiative, reportedly spearheaded by former President Donald Trump, targets his predecessors Joe Biden and Barack Obama with pointed labels.
The Controversial Additions to the Presidential Walk
Recently, the White House grounds saw the installation of new descriptive plaques beneath the photographs of past commanders-in-chief. This area, often referred to as the "Presidential Walk of Fame," traditionally honours the legacy of former leaders. However, the latest additions break from this tradition of decorum. The plaques for Presidents Joe Biden and Barack Obama feature derogatory nicknames and critiques, a clear departure from the neutral or respectful tone typically maintained in such official spaces.
Targeting Democratic Predecessors
The plaque for the 46th President, Joe Biden, reportedly uses the moniker "Sleepy Joe Biden," a label Trump has frequently employed during campaigns and public speeches. For the 44th President, Barack Obama, the plaque describes him as "divisive." These installations, confirmed to be in place as of 18 December 2025, represent a highly unusual use of the White House's historical displays for contemporary political commentary. The action is seen as a direct trolling effort by Trump against his political rivals from the Democratic Party.
Implications and Reactions
This development is more than a mere prank; it signifies the deepening of political divisions being etched into the very fabric of a key American institution. By placing these critical plaques within the White House, a symbol of the presidency itself, the act blurs the lines between personal political rivalry and official presidential history. It sets a precedent where the executive residence can be used to settle partisan scores, potentially influencing how future administrations view their role as custodians of the nation's legacy. The move is likely to draw strong reactions from political observers, historians, and the public, debating the appropriateness of such actions from a former president.
While the original report from the DH Web Desk did not detail immediate official responses, the installation has undoubtedly added a new chapter to the ongoing political narrative in the United States. It underscores the highly personalised nature of modern American politics, where former leaders directly engage in public rebukes through permanent installations.
