Karnataka Deputy Chief Minister D K Shivakumar has launched a sharp critique against the central government and neighbouring states, accusing them of non-cooperation and actively blocking crucial irrigation works related to the Upper Krishna project. The statement, made on January 9, 2026, highlights growing tensions over water resource management in the region.
Allegations of Stalled Progress and Political Hurdles
Shivakumar, who also holds the Water Resources portfolio, stated that the Congress government in Karnataka has given top priority to projects under the Krishna Bhagya Jal Nigam Limited (KBJNL). He emphasized that significant funds were sanctioned for these initiatives soon after the current administration assumed office. However, the Deputy CM lamented that the progress is being severely hampered by a lack of support from the Union government and obstructive tactics employed by neighbouring states.
While Shivakumar did not name the specific neighbouring states, the context points to ongoing inter-state water disputes, particularly with Telangana and Andhra Pradesh, over the sharing of Krishna river waters. The Upper Krishna Project is a major irrigation and drinking water scheme aimed at benefiting the drought-prone regions of north Karnataka.
State Government's Commitment and Fund Allocation
In his address, Shivakumar sought to underscore his government's commitment to completing long-pending irrigation projects. He pointed out that the state administration has not only prioritized the KBJNL projects but has also backed this commitment with substantial financial allocations. The clear implication is that Karnataka is ready and willing to move forward, but external forces are creating an impasse.
This accusation places the spotlight back on the perennial and politically sensitive issue of water sharing in southern India. The Krishna River Water Disputes Tribunal's awards have historically been a point of contention, with states often accusing each other of violating agreements and undertaking unauthorized projects.
Broader Implications for Regional Development and Politics
The public airing of these grievances by a senior minister carries significant political weight. It frames the issue as one where the state's development aspirations are being curtailed by a non-cooperative Centre and rival states. This narrative is likely to resonate in the regional political discourse, potentially positioning the state government as a proactive entity fighting for Karnataka's rightful share of resources.
The stalemate over the Upper Krishna project has direct consequences for farmers and water security in multiple districts. Delays in completing the project perpetuate agricultural uncertainty and hinder economic growth in the hinterlands. Shivakumar's statements bring this development bottleneck back into public focus, increasing pressure on all involved parties to seek a resolution.
As of now, there has been no immediate official reaction from the central government or the administrations of the neighbouring states mentioned in context. The coming days may see increased political dialogue, or further escalation, on this critical infrastructure and inter-state issue.
