Supreme Court Grants Bail to Congress MLA Kawasi Lakhma in Chhattisgarh Liquor Scam Money Laundering Case
In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India on Tuesday granted bail to former excise minister and sitting Congress MLA Kawasi Lakhma, who had been incarcerated for over a year in connection with a money laundering case linked to the Chhattisgarh liquor scam. The decision marks a pivotal moment in a high-profile legal battle that has drawn national attention.
Court Cites Trial Delays as Key Factor in Bail Decision
A bench headed by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant released Lakhma on bail, emphasizing the prolonged nature of the trial. The court noted that given the prosecution has cited numerous witnesses, there is little chance of an early conclusion to the proceedings. Lakhma has been in custody since January of last year, a factor that weighed heavily in the court's consideration.
The bench stated, "Given the extensive list of witnesses and the complexity of the case, a swift trial is unlikely, and the prolonged incarceration without conviction is a matter of concern." This rationale underscores the judiciary's focus on balancing the rights of the accused with the demands of justice.
Bail Conditions Imposed by the Supreme Court
However, the Supreme Court imposed strict conditions on Lakhma's bail. He has been directed to stay outside Chhattisgarh and must attend all trial proceedings by reaching the trial court a day prior to each hearing. This measure aims to ensure his presence and cooperation with the legal process.
When Lakhma's counsel, Sidharth Dave, raised concerns about his client's need to attend assembly sessions as a sitting MLA, the bench responded firmly. The court indicated that if necessary, it could direct his suspension from the House to comply with the bail terms, highlighting the seriousness with which it views the conditions.
Legal Arguments and Counterclaims in the Case
Earlier in the proceedings, Lakhma's defense, led by senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, argued vehemently that there is no concrete evidence against him. Rohatgi contended that Lakhma has been "roped in due to political vendetta," suggesting that the charges are motivated by partisan interests rather than factual grounds.
In response, senior advocate Mahesh Jethmalani and additional solicitor general S V Raju, representing the prosecution, presented a counter-narrative. They alleged that the former minister had exploited state liquor shops to facilitate the sale of illegally manufactured foreign liquor. According to the prosecution, this scheme was designed to enrich both Lakhma personally and the Congress party, implicating it in a broader network of corruption.
The contrasting arguments reflect the deep-seated tensions and political undertones of the case, which has become a flashpoint in Chhattisgarh's political landscape. As the trial continues, all eyes will be on how these allegations unfold in court.
