Maharashtra's Living Will System Sparks Vital End-of-Life Conversations
Living Wills in Maharashtra: Breaking Taboos on End-of-Life Care

Maharashtra's Living Will System Sparks Vital End-of-Life Conversations

In a society where discussions about death are frequently met with superstitious gestures or abrupt topic changes, individuals meticulously plan for every life milestone except the final one. This leaves end-of-life decisions to a chaotic blend of medical inertia and legal uncertainty. With Maharashtra now implementing a structured system to store and retrieve living wills, also known as advance medical directives, this critical concept is transitioning from private contemplation to essential public dialogue.

The Medical Perspective: A Doctor's Crusade for Patient Autonomy

For many years, Mumbai-based gynecologist Dr. Nikhil Datar has championed this transformative shift. He advocates for a framework that empowers individuals to determine the extent of medical intervention when recovery becomes improbable. Having witnessed prolonged suffering within his own family and among numerous patients, Dr. Datar emphasizes a systemic failure. "Each stakeholder—doctors, hospitals, relatives—operates under limitations. Tragically, the patient's own wishes are often completely lost in the process," he states.

In the absence of a written directive, physicians are ethically and legally bound to continue treatment indefinitely. "Even when they recognize further intervention is futile, the established medical code of ethics prohibits them from acting otherwise," Dr. Datar explains. This leads to extended medical procedures that offer little improvement in quality of life, creating a scenario where, in his words, "everyone becomes a victim of circumstances."

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Grassroots Movements: Overcoming Deep-Seated Psychological Barriers

Beyond legal frameworks, this cultural shift is being quietly shaped by individuals taking personal initiative. In Pune, retired finance professional Uday Thakur Desai, 73, regularly conducts sessions on living wills within his retirement community. While approximately 70 residents have completed their directives, widespread hesitation persists. "People attend, engage in discussion, return home, and then take no action," he observes, attributing this inertia to profound psychological resistance. "It remains a powerful taboo. Most individuals simply refuse to discuss it." This reluctance extends even to medical professionals, as a close friend who is a surgeon declined to create a living will.

Desai notes that proactive planning is rare without a direct catalyst. "Until an extreme personal crisis occurs, people do not act. They read about the concept but fail to connect it to their own lives," he says. The reality of solitary living for many seniors adds urgency. "A significant number of us live alone. This isolation makes it absolutely essential to contemplate and document these decisions in advance."

Personal and Professional Motivations: A Doctor's Journey

For Mumbai-based homeopath Dr. Neha Seth, 63, the decision to create a living will was influenced by both her medical career and personal tragedy. "As a physician, I have witnessed patients endure immense suffering while families exhaust all their financial and emotional resources," she shares. "When you reach a point of no return medically, what is the purpose? What meaning is there in artificially prolonging a life devoid of quality?" Her perspective was solidified by the four-year ordeal of her bedridden mother, an experience that left a permanent emotional scar.

"We essentially established a miniature hospital at home. However, not every family possesses the capability for such an undertaking. It devastates families both financially and emotionally," Dr. Seth explains. "During that time, we lacked the legal provision for advance directives. Had it existed, my mother would have been the first to explicitly state, 'do not pursue interventions beyond a certain point.'"

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration

When Dr. Seth began drafting her own living will, she attempted to initiate a family conversation. "I posted information in our family WhatsApp group, and not a single person responded," she reveals. "We are a close-knit, educated family. Yet, nobody wishes to engage with this topic." For her, this collective silence represents the most significant obstacle. "People prefer to brush these discussions under the carpet. But when the inevitable occurs, everyone suffers the consequences of that avoidance."

Proactive Planning: A Couple's Deliberate Choice

For retired secondary school teacher Anjana Karnik, 76, and her husband Uday Karnik, 78, a conciliator for RERA, the choice was made decades ago after observing unnecessarily prolonged medical treatments. "After seeing how interventions were extended despite no genuine improvement in condition, we resolved that we must retain the right to choose the nature of our own medical care," she states. Acting on this conviction, they formalized their living wills on April 10, 2026, placing them among the most recent individuals to complete the process.

While their family, including children living overseas who provided consent when consulted, was supportive, Karnik acknowledges that many others face profound struggles. "People grapple with the question: How can I make such a decision for my parents? What will society think? That fear paralyzes them," she says. She also highlights systemic pressures within healthcare. "Doctors may personally understand, but they face professional and legal constraints. Families are often divided in their opinions. And crucially, the patient's own voice is frequently absent from the conversation."

The Common Challenge: Bridging the Communication Gap

A consistent theme emerges from these diverse narratives: pervasive hesitation. This reluctance persists even among those who possess a clear understanding of the issues. Dr. Datar encapsulates the core dilemma: "The older generation often assumes the younger generation will instinctively make the correct decisions. However, if specific wishes are never communicated, how can they possibly know what those decisions should be?"

A living will transcends its status as a mere legal document. It represents a crucial conversation that society remains largely unwilling to start. Nevertheless, gradual change is underway. From retirement communities in Pune to clinical practices in Mumbai, a growing number of people are striving to reclaim personal agency over life's most uncertain chapter. As Dr. Seth powerfully articulates, the fundamental issue is not about ending life, but rather about preserving its inherent dignity and meaning until the very end.