In a disturbing case from Kerala, a mother and her stepfather have been formally charged under anti-terror laws for allegedly attempting to indoctrinate a young boy to join the terrorist organization ISIS. The case has drawn the attention of central intelligence agencies who are now closely monitoring the developments.
Case Registration and Legal Action
The Kerala Police registered the case under the stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act on November 14, 2025. This legal action represents one of the rare instances where family members are accused of attempting to radicalize their own child for terrorist purposes within India.
According to official sources, the case came to light after authorities received information about the systematic indoctrination attempts targeting the minor boy. The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, commonly known as UAPA, is India's primary anti-terrorism legislation designed to combat unlawful activities and terrorist associations.
Central Agencies Take Notice
Central intelligence agencies have actively collected details and evidence related to this case. Their involvement underscores the seriousness with which security establishments are treating this instance of alleged domestic radicalization.
The agencies' intervention suggests that this case may have broader implications for understanding radicalization patterns within family units in India. Intelligence officials are particularly concerned about the methods used to influence the minor and whether this represents an isolated incident or part of a larger pattern.
Ongoing Investigation and Implications
While specific details about the accused individuals remain limited due to the sensitive nature of the case and ongoing investigation, the registration of the case on November 14 marks a significant development in Kerala's counter-terrorism efforts.
Security experts note that cases involving family members in radicalization attempts present unique challenges for law enforcement agencies. The emotional dynamics and privacy of family relationships often complicate detection and intervention efforts.
This case emerges against the backdrop of India's continued vigilance against terrorist organizations and their recruitment strategies. The use of UAPA provisions indicates that authorities consider the allegations sufficiently serious to warrant the application of anti-terror legislation.
As the investigation progresses, security agencies are likely to examine potential connections to wider networks and assess whether the accused individuals had external guidance or support in their alleged indoctrination efforts.
