Jaipur Consumer Commission Chairman Requests Security Following Threats in Bollywood Ad Cases
In a concerning development from Jaipur, the Chairman of District Consumer Commission No. 2, Gyarsi Lal Meena, has formally sought security protection after allegedly receiving repeated telephonic threats. These threats reportedly occurred while he was presiding over cases involving high-profile Bollywood actors Shah Rukh Khan and Salman Khan, among others, in matters related to misleading advertisements.
Official Letter Details Threats and Judicial Concerns
In a letter addressed to the Registrar of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission and the Jaipur Police Commissioner on Wednesday, Chairman Meena outlined the serious situation. He stated that he is handling multiple cases under the Consumer Protection Act, including complaints concerning advertisements for Rajshree Pan Masala and Vimal Pan Masala. As part of these proceedings, he has passed orders against certain film actors.
According to the letter, following these judicial actions, Meena began receiving repeated threats over the phone. The threats allegedly came from an individual identified as Narendra Kesar, along with other unidentified persons. Meena expressed in his correspondence that "attempts are being made to exert direct and indirect pressure on him in connection with the cases under consideration."
Apprehensions About Judicial Process and Personal Safety
The Chairman raised significant concerns about the potential impact of these threats on the judicial system. He stated that such actions could "obstruct the judicial process" and "pose a threat to his life and property." In light of these dangers, Meena has formally requested that adequate security arrangements be implemented both at the Consumer Commission premises and at his personal residence.
The letter also highlighted the broader context of misleading advertisements, noting that this issue was raised in Parliament on December 5 by MPs Hanuman Beniwal and Rajkumar Roat. It mentioned that national-level efforts are underway to introduce stricter laws to curb misleading advertisements, underscoring the wider public importance of these cases.
Broader Implications and Government Responsibility
Chairman Meena's request carries substantial weight, as he explicitly stated that, in the event of any harm to his life or property, the responsibility would lie with the state government. This declaration emphasizes the seriousness of the threats and the need for immediate protective measures.
The situation raises important questions about:
- The safety of judicial officers handling high-profile cases
- The integrity of consumer protection proceedings
- The enforcement of laws against misleading advertisements
- The broader societal impact of celebrity-endorsed products
This incident underscores the challenges faced by consumer protection authorities when dealing with cases involving influential public figures and commercial interests. The outcome of Meena's security request and the continued handling of these advertisement cases will be closely watched by legal observers and consumer rights advocates across the nation.
