Conservationist Urges Immediate Action to Restore Bhimgad Wildlife Sanctuary's Ecology
Bhimgad Sanctuary: Call to Remove Invasive Plants, Delay Safari

Conservationist Urges Immediate Action to Restore Bhimgad Wildlife Sanctuary's Ecological Balance

In a significant move for wildlife preservation, prominent conservationist Giridhar Kulkarni has formally urged the Karnataka state forest department to take immediate and decisive steps to restore the ecological equilibrium of the Bhimgad Wildlife Sanctuary. Kulkarni submitted a detailed representation to Deputy Conservator of Forests (DCF) NE Kranthi of the Belagavi division, outlining critical concerns and actionable recommendations.

Systematic Removal of Invasive Species Recommended

Kulkarni's primary recommendation centers on the systematic eradication of non-native Acacia auriculiformis plants, which have extensively colonized the sanctuary. He emphasized that the widespread presence of these invasive trees has severely degraded native vegetation, fundamentally altered soil conditions, and disrupted the area's natural hydrology. The sanctuary, spanning an impressive 3,363 hectares, is significantly affected by this ecological imbalance.

The conservationist pointed out a direct contradiction with existing guidelines. The sanctuary's official Management Plan for the period 2018–19 to 2028–29 explicitly discourages plantation activities within grasslands and natural forest ecosystems due to their paramount ecological importance. Kulkarni argued that the large-scale Acacia auriculiformis plantations blatantly contradict these conservation directives.

Threat to Prey-Predator Dynamics and Rising Human-Wildlife Conflict

The degradation of habitat has precipitated a concerning decline in the availability of fodder and water for herbivores within the sanctuary. This scarcity directly leads to a reduction in prey populations, which in turn disrupts the delicate prey-predator balance essential for a healthy ecosystem.

A direct consequence of this habitat loss is the escalating incidence of human-wildlife conflict in surrounding villages. As natural resources dwindle inside the sanctuary, wildlife is increasingly forced to venture into nearby agricultural fields and human settlements in search of sustenance, creating dangerous and costly encounters.

Proposed Phased Restoration and Deferral of Tourism

Drawing inspiration from successful conservation models, Kulkarni cited the exemplary case of the Ranebennur Blackbuck Sanctuary. There, the strategic removal of non-native plant species successfully revived native grasslands and dramatically improved overall habitat conditions for wildlife. He is confident that implementing similar, science-based restoration measures could rejuvenate the beleaguered ecosystems of Bhimgad.

His proposed action plan includes:

  1. Initiating a fresh enumeration and comprehensive spatial mapping exercise to accurately assess the full extent of areas affected by the invasive species.
  2. Executing a phased removal of the Acacia auriculiformis plants.
  3. Following extraction, focusing entirely on natural regeneration and soil conservation, with a strict moratorium on introducing any new plantations.

Kulkarni strongly recommended postponing any proposed safari or tourism activities until the ecological restoration process is substantially complete. He argued that launching commercial tourism in a currently degraded habitat is premature and could severely undermine the core objectives of conservation and recovery.

Community Benefits and Legal Framework

The conservationist also highlighted potential socio-economic benefits. The removal operation could generate valuable employment opportunities for local communities. Furthermore, the extracted timber and firewood could be auctioned, creating a revenue stream. These funds could then be strategically reinvested into critical areas like habitat restoration, anti-poaching initiatives, and other long-term conservation activities.

Finally, Kulkarni urged the forest department to undertake a thorough review and, if necessary, modify the sanctuary's management plan. This review should ensure strict alignment with the provisions and conservation ethos of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, to guarantee legally sound and ecologically effective management.