A leader from the Revolutionary Socialist Party (RSP) has publicly questioned the Communist Party of India (Marxist)'s recent claim regarding an alleged AI-generated photograph, while also pressing for answers in a separate gold loss case. The exchange has intensified political tensions in Kerala.
RSP Leader Dismisses CPI(M)'s AI Understanding
The controversy erupted when CPI(M) leaders alleged that a photograph showing the Kerala Chief Minister with another individual, Potty, was fabricated using artificial intelligence. Responding to these claims on 27 December 2025, RSP leader John delivered a sharp rebuttal.
John asserted that the CPI(M) leadership possesses no fundamental understanding of AI technology. He suggested that their accusation was a baseless attempt to deflect from more pressing issues. His comments highlight a growing trend where political disputes are intersecting with debates over digital authenticity and technological literacy.
Persistent Questions on the Gold Loss Case
Beyond the war of words over the photograph, John used the opportunity to redirect focus to a longstanding and contentious issue: the gold loss case. He explicitly called for the CPI(M) to provide clear and satisfactory answers regarding this matter.
While the specific details of the gold loss case were not elaborated in the brief report, it is understood to be a subject of significant political and public interest in the state. By linking the two issues, the RSP leader aims to hold the ruling party accountable on multiple fronts.
Political Implications in Kerala
This public challenge from a key political figure signifies ongoing friction within Kerala's political landscape. The use of artificial intelligence as a point of contention marks a new dimension in political sparring, where the veracity of visual evidence can be called into question with a simple allegation.
The dual-pronged attack—mocking the CPI(M)'s technological claims while demanding accountability on a financial scandal—is a strategic political move. It puts the CPI(M) on the defensive, forcing them to address both a modern technological critique and a traditional allegation of malpractice.
As of now, the CPI(M) has not issued a detailed counter-response to John's latest statements. The development ensures that both the AI photo controversy and the gold loss case will remain in the public discourse, potentially influencing political narratives in the lead-up to future elections.
