In a significant development in Parliament, the central government has expressed its willingness to engage in discussions regarding the Special Intensive Revision Programme (SIRP) but has firmly pushed back against the Opposition's insistence on setting a specific timeline for the debate. The statement was made by Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju in the Rajya Sabha on Monday, December 1, 2025.
Government's Stance on Parliamentary Debate
Minister Kiren Rijiju addressed the Upper House, clarifying the government's position on the ongoing demand for a discussion on the SIRP. He asserted that the administration is "not averse to discussing anything" of national importance. This indicates a clear openness from the Treasury Benches to engage on the subject matter raised by the Opposition parties.
However, the minister attached a crucial caveat to this openness. He emphasized that while the demand put forth by the Opposition is under the government's active consideration, it should not come with a precondition of a strict schedule. The Centre's message was clear: it is prepared for dialogue but resists being compelled to adhere to an externally imposed deadline for such parliamentary proceedings.
Opposition's Demand and Political Context
The Opposition has been seeking a dedicated and time-bound discussion on the Special Intensive Revision Programme, a matter they deem urgent. Their insistence on a timeline is seen as a strategy to hold the government accountable and ensure the topic receives priority in the parliamentary agenda.
Rijiju's statement, made around 12:32 PM IST on December 1, 2025, is a direct response to this pressure. By stating the demand is "under consideration," the government acknowledges the issue but retains control over the parliamentary schedule, a prerogative typically held by the ruling side in consultation with the Speaker and Chairman.
Implications for Parliament's Winter Session
This exchange sets the tone for potential negotiations between the government and the Opposition in the ongoing Winter Session. The government's dual stance—openness to discussion coupled with refusal to be rushed—could lead to further deliberations behind the scenes to find a mutually acceptable slot for the debate.
The development highlights the classic tussle between the executive and the legislature's role in setting the agenda. While the Opposition seeks to highlight specific issues through scheduled debates, the government aims to manage the House's time based on its own legislative priorities and political strategy. The outcome of this standoff will be closely watched as it may influence the productivity and tenor of the rest of the parliamentary session.
