Kiren Rijiju Defends Speaker Om Birla in Heated Lok Sabha Debate
Sharp political exchanges erupted in the Lok Sabha on March 10, 2026, during a debate on a no-confidence motion against Speaker Om Birla. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju launched a strong defense of the Speaker's authority while hitting back at Opposition criticism.
Rijiju's Firm Stance on Parliamentary Rules
In his address to the House, Rijiju emphasized that parliamentary rules must be respected by all members without exception. "There is no cure if someone believes they are above the authority of the Speaker," Rijiju stated pointedly, taking a direct swipe at Opposition members.
The minister specifically referred to earlier remarks made by Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi regarding speaking rights in Parliament. Rijiju argued that both the Constitution and House rules clearly mandate that members require explicit permission from the Speaker before addressing the House.
Dismissing Allegations of Partiality
Rijiju categorically dismissed claims that Speaker Om Birla was showing partiality toward the ruling alliance. "The Speaker conducts proceedings according to established parliamentary traditions and rules," the minister asserted during the heated debate.
The Parliamentary Affairs Minister stressed that maintaining decorum and respecting institutional procedures were essential for the functioning of democracy. His comments came in response to the no-confidence motion introduced by Congress MP Mohammad Jawed, which triggered the intense parliamentary discussion.
Context of the Parliamentary Confrontation
The debate highlighted ongoing tensions between the government and Opposition regarding parliamentary procedures. Rijiju's remarks underscored the government's position that:
- The Speaker's authority must remain unquestioned
- Parliamentary rules apply equally to all members
- Institutional decorum is paramount for legislative functioning
The exchange represents another chapter in the ongoing political battles being fought on the floor of India's lower house of Parliament, with both sides firmly defending their positions on procedural matters and institutional authority.
