Karnataka Congress president B K Hariprasad sparked a political storm on Wednesday by drawing a controversial parallel between Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Union Home Minister Amit Shah, and the 11th-century invader Mahmud Ghazni. Speaking to reporters in Bengaluru, Hariprasad questioned the Bharatiya Janata Party's (BJP) claims of religious piety amid reports of financial irregularities in the funds collected for the Ram Temple in Ayodhya.
Controversial Comparison and Allegations
"What is the difference between Mahmud Ghazni and Modi-Shah? Ghazni looted temples, but these people are looting in the name of building a temple," Hariprasad said. He accused the BJP of behaving as if they have a monopoly over religion and have adopted Lord Ram exclusively, yet failing to address the alleged financial mismanagement of donations meant for the Ram Mandir.
The Congress leader's remarks come amid a growing row over the collection and utilisation of funds for the Ram Temple construction. Hariprasad alleged that there were significant discrepancies in the accounts, though he did not provide specific evidence. The BJP has dismissed the allegations as baseless and politically motivated.
Political Reactions and Implications
The BJP reacted sharply to Hariprasad's comments, with state party president B Y Vijayendra calling them "unfortunate and disrespectful." He said, "Comparing our respected Prime Minister and Home Minister to a foreign invader who destroyed temples shows the Congress's desperation and lack of respect for Hindu sentiments."
Political analysts note that the statement is likely to intensify the war of words between the Congress and BJP in Karnataka, which is heading for assembly elections next year. The Ram Temple issue has been a key emotional plank for the BJP, and any criticism of the temple's funding is seen as an attack on Hindu faith.
Background of the Donation Row
The Ram Mandir donation controversy erupted after reports emerged questioning the transparency of the funds collected by various trusts and organisations. The Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust, which oversees the temple construction, has maintained that all donations are accounted for and audited. However, opposition parties have demanded a thorough investigation.
Hariprasad's reference to Mahmud Ghazni, who is historically known for his raids on Indian temples, particularly the Somnath Temple, was seen as a deliberate provocation. The Congress leader argued that while Ghazni looted openly, the BJP was siphoning off funds under the guise of religious duty.
Conclusion
The row highlights the deep political divide over the Ram Temple, which remains a potent symbol in Indian politics. As the debate over donation transparency continues, the Congress has promised to raise the issue in Parliament and demand a CBI inquiry. The BJP, on the other hand, has accused the Congress of hurting Hindu sentiments and diverting attention from development issues.
