‘Stop Lying To My Face’: Comer’s Fiery Clash With McGovern Over Clinton-Epstein Link
In a dramatic House Rules Committee hearing on February 2, 2026, tensions flared as Republican Representative James Comer and Democratic Representative James McGovern engaged in a sharp confrontation over Contempt of Congress charges related to former US President Bill Clinton. The exchange, marked by heated rhetoric, centered on accountability, congressional investigations, and oversight mechanisms, highlighting deep partisan divides.
Explosive Exchange Over Clinton’s Involvement
The hearing quickly escalated when Comer accused McGovern of misleading statements regarding Clinton’s connections to the late financier Jeffrey Epstein. Comer’s outburst, captured in viral moments, included the direct challenge: “Stop lying to my face,” underscoring the intensity of the debate. This clash reflects ongoing scrutiny into high-profile figures linked to Epstein, with lawmakers pushing for transparency and legal accountability.
Partisan Battle on Congressional Oversight
Beyond the personal accusations, the hearing delved into broader issues of congressional authority and the enforcement of Contempt of Congress charges. McGovern defended the investigative processes, while Comer emphasized the need for rigorous oversight to ensure public trust. The debate touched on historical precedents and the role of Congress in holding powerful individuals accountable, sparking discussions on legislative integrity.
Context of Epstein-Related Investigations
This confrontation occurs amid renewed public interest in Epstein’s network, following recent releases of unseen images and testimonies. The hearing’s focus on Clinton adds to a series of high-stakes political battles, as both parties navigate the implications for upcoming elections and public perception. The event underscores the challenges in balancing investigative zeal with procedural fairness in a polarized environment.
As the hearing concluded, the unresolved tensions signaled potential future clashes, with observers noting the impact on bipartisan cooperation and the ongoing pursuit of justice in Epstein-related cases. The episode serves as a reminder of the volatile nature of congressional hearings in addressing sensitive and politically charged issues.
