State challenges High Court verdict in Supreme Court
The Tamil Nadu government on Tuesday filed a petition in the Supreme Court against the Madras High Court's decision allowing the lighting of a lamp on the Thiruparankundram hill, a site of religious significance. The state argued that the order could lead to communal tension and law and order issues.
Background of the dispute
The controversy erupted after a Hindu group sought permission to light a lamp atop the hill, which is also revered by Muslims. The Madras High Court, in its June 20 order, permitted the ritual, citing the right to practice religion. However, the state government contended that the hill is a protected monument and that such activities could disturb peace.
Government's concerns
According to the state's petition, the High Court did not consider the potential for unrest. The government emphasized that the hill is under the control of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) and that any religious activity requires prior approval. The petition states, "The order may lead to a breakdown of law and order, and the state has a duty to maintain peace."
Legal arguments
The Tamil Nadu government argued that the High Court judgment violates the principles of secularism and the Places of Worship Act, 1991, which maintains the religious character of sites as they existed in 1947. The state also highlighted that the hill is a site of multiple faiths and that any unilateral decision could spark conflict.
Next steps
The Supreme Court is expected to hear the case later this week. The state has sought an interim stay on the High Court order until the final disposal of the petition. The court may also issue notices to the parties involved, including the Hindu group that originally sought permission.
