Hisar Police Probe Clears CIA Inspector, Questions Chautala Convoy Security
Hisar Probe Clears CIA Inspector, Questions Chautala Convoy

Hisar Police Inquiry Exonerates CIA Officer, Scrutinizes Chautala Convoy Security

The police investigation into the violent clashes that erupted following an INSO protest at Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology (GJUST) in Hisar has taken a significant new direction. The inquiry officer has effectively absolved CIA in-charge inspector Pawan of any wrongdoing, while simultaneously casting serious doubt on the security arrangements surrounding former deputy chief minister Dushyant Chautala's convoy and its pilot vehicle.

DSP Addresses Media, Details Sequence of Events

Deputy Superintendent of Police Kamaljit Singh, speaking at a press conference on Sunday, stated that a thorough review of the incident's timeline revealed no evidence of misconduct by inspector Pawan. He elaborated that when Dushyant Chautala and Digvijay Chautala arrived at the city police station to surrender, they were explicitly informed that only individuals specifically named as accused would face arrest. Despite this clarification, they reportedly demanded broader arrests before departing for the Mini Secretariat.

During this period, inspector Pawan had already mobilized with his team. At the Sabzi Mandi overbridge, he briefly intercepted the driver of the pilot vehicle to issue a warning against reckless driving. The driver was allegedly attempting an overtaking maneuver from the incorrect side of the road, creating a substantial risk of a collision.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Key Findings: Unarmed Officer and Security Protocol Violations

The investigation uncovered that inspector Pawan was not carrying any weapon at the time of the incident. This fact was confirmed by a statement from a local shopkeeper and was further supported by official records indicating no firearm was issued to him on that particular day. Regarding the alleged manhandling of ESI Rajkumar, DSP Singh clarified that the officer had stopped at the location to manage traffic flow amidst the VIP movement.

A critical revelation from the inquiry centers on security protocols. The probe determined that individuals granted Y-plus security cover are not entitled to pilot or escort vehicles as part of their protection detail. Police officials emphasized that the vehicles accompanying Chautala's convoy were privately arranged and lacked government authorization. Consequently, formal notices have been issued to police personnel found traveling in those unauthorized vehicles.

Multiple Complaints and Pilot Vehicle's Traffic Record

DSP Kamaljit Singh is currently reviewing four distinct complaints related to the entire episode. These complaints involve Dushyant Chautala, his security personnel, EHC Pradeep Kumar, inspector Pawan, and ESI Rajkumar. Authorities confirmed that video evidence clearly captures the scuffle involving Rajkumar.

Furthermore, the inquiry revealed that the pilot vehicle, bearing registration number PB 15Z 3797, has four outstanding traffic challans for overspeeding, with the associated fines remaining unpaid. This detail adds another layer of scrutiny to the convoy's operations and compliance with traffic regulations.

The ongoing investigation continues to examine all aspects of the incident, with a focus on adherence to security protocols and the actions of all parties involved during the volatile situation at GJUST.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration