Punjab and Haryana High Court Mandates Expedited Inquiry into Serious Allegations Against Police Officer
The Punjab and Haryana High Court has issued a significant directive, ordering state authorities to conclude an inquiry within three weeks regarding a complaint alleging sexual exploitation by a Punjab Police officer holding the rank of Superintendent of Police. The court emphasized the necessity of passing a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with the law, ensuring transparency and accountability in the process.
Petition Details and Court's Ruling
This direction stems from a petition filed seeking multiple actions, including the registration of a First Information Report (FIR) based on a complaint dated September 10, 2025. The petitioner also requested the transfer of the matter to an independent agency or the constitution of a Special Investigation Team, along with protection measures. In its disposal of the petition, the court instructed the official respondents to finalize the inquiry on the complaint within a period of three weeks from today, by issuing a detailed order and taking necessary action if required.
The court further clarified that in case the concerned respondent does not find any substance in the allegations, the petitioner must be informed as per the legal mandate. This ensures that the complainant receives proper communication regarding the outcome, upholding principles of justice and due process.
Allegations and State's Response
The petitioner alleged that the officer misled her into a marriage ceremony and subsequently subjected her to abuse, rape, and forced abortions. Despite these serious claims, no FIR was registered based on her initial complaint. In response, the state submitted that the complaint had been referred to the Bureau of Investigation and was under inquiry by the Inspector-General of Police, Faridkot Range. The state assured the court that the inquiry would be concluded within the stipulated three-week timeframe.
Judicial Observations on Delay and Fairness
The Bench of Justice Shalini Singh Nagpal made critical observations during the proceedings. The court noted an abnormal delay of 12 years in the filing of the complaint, highlighting potential challenges in evidence and investigation. However, the court also stated that there is nothing on record to suggest that the inquiry is not being conducted fairly. Expressing confidence, the court asserted that the inquiry officer would conduct the proceedings in a free, fair, and impartial manner, reinforcing trust in the investigative process.
This case underscores the judiciary's role in ensuring timely and just resolutions in matters involving serious allegations against law enforcement officials, balancing the need for swift action with procedural integrity.
