In a significant development, the Andhra Pradesh High Court on Friday granted interim anticipatory bail to former Gannavaram MLA Vallabhaneni Vamshi in a case where he is accused of attempt to murder. The case was registered by the Machavaram police based on a complaint by Nutakki Sunil.
Petition Highlights 16-Month Delay in FIR
The legal relief came after Vamshi approached the high court seeking pre-arrest bail. A key argument presented by his defense was the unexplained delay of 16 months in lodging the First Information Report (FIR). The alleged incident, which forms the basis of the case, is said to have occurred before the elections.
According to the complaint, Nutakki Sunil, described as a follower of the incumbent MLA Yarlagadda Venkat Rao, suffered severe injuries in the attack. It was alleged that Vamshi, along with his supporters, assaulted Sunil with the intent to kill, causing him grievous harm.
Court Proceedings and the Interim Order
During the hearing before Justice Y Lakshmana Rao, Vamshi's counsel, Devi Satya Sri, pleaded for interim protection. She informed the court that the matter had been listed four times and all necessary documents had been submitted. Emphasizing the imminent threat of arrest faced by her client, she sought protective relief until the next hearing date.
Justice Lakshmana Rao, considering the submissions, directed the police not to arrest Vallabhaneni Vamshi until the next date of hearing. The court is scheduled to revisit the matter after the Sankranthi vacation.
Implications and Next Steps
This interim order provides temporary respite to the former legislator from potential arrest in connection with this case. The court's decision to grant interim anticipatory bail often hinges on factors like the nature of the allegations, the possibility of the accused fleeing, and potential evidence tampering. The final decision on the anticipatory bail plea will be taken in the post-vacation hearing.
The case highlights the legal complexities surrounding delayed FIRs and the judicial process for public figures facing serious criminal charges. All parties are now expected to present their detailed arguments when the court reconvenes.
