In a dramatic confrontation at the United Nations, Russia and China have launched scathing criticism against a US-backed post-war plan for Gaza, labeling it a 'colonial' scheme that threatens the very foundation of the two-state solution. The sharp warnings came during debates about establishing an international 'Board of Peace' to administer the Palestinian enclave.
Moscow and Beijing's Strong Opposition
Both Moscow and Beijing expressed serious concerns that the proposed stabilization plan effectively sidelines Palestinian sovereignty and risks entrenching external control rather than creating a pathway to genuine independence. The Russian delegation particularly emphasized that no foreign power 'owns Gaza,' directly challenging the approach taken by the United States and supporting Muslim nations.
The controversy erupted after the UN Security Council, with support from several Muslim countries, passed a US resolution based on what's being referred to as the 'Trump plan' for Gaza. This resolution calls for multiple significant measures including the deployment of international forces to the region, complete disarmament of Hamas and other Palestinian resistance factions, and establishing peace with Israel without explicitly ending the Palestinian occupation.
The Core Controversy: Sovereignty vs Control
At the heart of the disagreement lies fundamental differences in approach to resolving the Gaza conflict. The Russian and Chinese positions argue that the US-led plan prioritizes security arrangements over political solutions, potentially creating a permanent international administration that would prevent the emergence of an independent Palestinian state.
The timing of this diplomatic clash is significant, coming as global powers attempt to shape Gaza's future after months of conflict. The Russian representative's full speech highlighted what they perceive as double standards in the international community's approach to Palestinian self-determination.
International Reactions and Implications
The division among global powers reflects deeper geopolitical tensions extending beyond the Palestinian issue. The alignment of certain Muslim nations with the US position has drawn particular criticism from Moscow and Beijing, who accuse them of compromising Palestinian rights for political expediency.
This development threatens to complicate international efforts to stabilize Gaza, as the strong opposition from two permanent UN Security Council members could hinder implementation of any agreed plan. The debate continues as diplomats struggle to balance immediate security concerns with long-term political solutions for the Palestinian people.
