In a fiery condemnation, US Congresswoman Ilhan Omar has launched a scathing attack on President Donald Trump following his derogatory remarks targeting Somali Americans. The incident, which occurred during a recent Cabinet meeting, has ignited a fresh wave of political controversy and backlash.
Trump's Controversial 'Stinky' Comments Spark Outrage
The controversy erupted after President Donald Trump made incendiary comments about Somali Americans, reportedly referring to them as "garbage" and demanding they "go back" to their countries. His remarks, delivered on December 5, 2025, also singled out Congresswoman Ilhan Omar, a Somali-American lawmaker herself. The comments were immediately met with widespread condemnation from various quarters across the United States and internationally.
Omar's Fiery Rebuttal: 'Creepy and Unhealthy' Fixation
In a powerful response carried by the Reuters news agency, Ilhan Omar did not hold back. She accused the President of being bigoted, xenophobic, and Islamophobic. Omar characterized Trump's persistent focus on her and the broader Somali community as "creepy and unhealthy." Her rebuke highlighted the personal and prejudiced nature of the attack, framing it as part of a broader pattern of divisive rhetoric from the administration.
The Congresswoman's statement served as a fierce defense of her community and a direct challenge to the President's language. She positioned the remarks not just as an insult to her, but as a harmful stereotype affecting all Somali Americans, questioning their place and contribution to American society.
Immediate Backlash and Wider Political Fallout
The immediate aftermath of Trump's comments saw a swift and significant backlash. Political analysts suggest such incidents deepen existing societal divisions. For the Somali-American community, the remarks are seen as a painful reinforcement of negative stereotypes.
This episode is the latest in a series of confrontations between Trump and Omar, reflecting the highly polarized state of US politics. It raises questions about the tone of national discourse and the impact of such language on minority communities. The incident is likely to fuel further debate on immigration, identity, and the boundaries of political rhetoric in the lead-up to future electoral cycles.
