The chargesheet against accused No. 52, Katta Pronnoy Prakash, in the alleged liquor scam case in Andhra Pradesh has unveiled a high-stakes conspiracy involving shadowy cash hubs and encrypted international calls. The Special Investigation Team (SIT) has identified him as a key operative in the syndicate, accusing him of evolving from an enforcer of favored liquor brands to the custodian of crores in kickback money.
Role in the Liquor Syndicate
According to the chargesheet filed before the special judge for SPE and ACB cases in Vijayawada, Prakash initially served as a project manager who ensured the sale of syndicate-linked liquor brands in government retail outlets. Witnesses testified that he participated in conference calls with excise officials and syndicate leaders, issuing instructions to prioritize certain brands and threatening staff with disciplinary action if they resisted. Over time, his responsibilities expanded to include the custodianship of massive cash collections.
Cash Collection and Dispatch Hub
The SIT alleged that in June 2023, under instructions from accused No. 8 Booneti Chanakya, Prakash rented a flat in an apartment complex in Tadepalli near Vijayawada. This location became a major hub for cash collection and dispatch during the 2024 elections. Prakash coordinated with distillery representatives and cash handlers to dispatch boxes to politicians. His network extended across Hyderabad and Andhra Pradesh, with apartments and safehouses in Nanakramguda, Khajaguda, Banjara Hills, and Jubilee Hills serving as collection points.
Attempts to Flee and International Links
Forensic analysis of Prakash's phone revealed internet searches about escaping India via Nepal. Digital evidence also placed him in Tanzania and Zimbabwe, allegedly alongside a former MLA. The chargesheet further alleges that Prakash attempted to flee India through Nepal, but was thwarted by investigative efforts.
Threats and Demands
Prakash allegedly lashed out at a fellow accused, demanding a 5% share of the illegal gains and warning that he would turn whistleblower if sidelined. This behavior underscores the internal tensions within the syndicate and Prakash's assertiveness in securing his interests.
Conclusion
The chargesheet paints a detailed picture of Prakash's involvement, from enforcing brand sales to managing cash flows and attempting to evade justice. The SIT continues to investigate the broader network of accused individuals and their roles in the alleged liquor scam.
