US Criticizes WHO's 'Bloated, Inefficient Bureaucracy' as It Ends Membership
US Slams WHO Bureaucracy, Terminates Membership

The United States has officially terminated its membership in the World Health Organization (WHO), delivering a sharp critique of the agency's operational inefficiencies. In a decisive move, US officials described the WHO as burdened by a "bloated and inefficient bureaucracy," highlighting longstanding concerns over its management and effectiveness in global health crises.

US Withdrawal and Criticism of WHO Structure

This termination marks a significant shift in US engagement with international health bodies, following years of escalating tensions. The US government has pointed to the WHO's bureaucratic hurdles as a primary reason for its exit, arguing that these issues have hampered timely responses to health emergencies, including recent pandemics. Officials emphasized that the decision reflects a broader reassessment of America's role in multilateral institutions.

Implications for Global Health Governance

The US withdrawal raises critical questions about the future of global health coordination. Without US membership, the WHO may face funding shortfalls and reduced political influence, potentially affecting its ability to lead international efforts against diseases. This move could prompt other nations to reconsider their commitments or push for reforms within the organization to address bureaucratic inefficiencies.

Calls for Reform and International Reactions

In announcing the termination, US representatives called for sweeping reforms to make the WHO more agile and accountable. They suggested that streamlining its bureaucracy could enhance its capacity to manage health threats effectively. International reactions have been mixed, with some allies expressing concern over the fragmentation of global health efforts, while others see it as an opportunity to advocate for structural changes in the WHO.

As the US steps back, the focus now shifts to how the WHO will adapt to this new landscape and whether it can implement the necessary reforms to regain trust and efficiency in its mission to safeguard global health.