Poster Controversy Erupts in Surat Ahead of Civic Polls, Multiple FIRs Filed
Surat Poster Controversy: FIRs Filed Ahead of Civic Polls

Poster Controversy Erupts in Surat Ahead of Civic Body Elections

A significant political controversy has erupted in Surat just days before the announcement of civic body elections, as posters targeting the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) have surfaced across multiple areas of the city. This development has led to the registration of five First Information Reports (FIRs) at different police stations against at least 18 individuals.

Multiple Police Complaints Filed by BJP Workers

BJP office-bearers and party workers lodged formal complaints at five separate police stations: Puna, Pandesara, Dindoli, Katargam, and Utran. The complaints were filed by BJP members Dharmendra Kakadiya, Sharad Patil, Shyamlal Yadav, Jagdish Gohil, and Sanjay Raghwani at these respective stations.

According to the complaints, numerous posters appeared across Surat containing serious allegations against the BJP. The posters addressed various issues including:

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list
  • Corruption allegations
  • Rising education costs
  • Persistent inflation concerns
  • Drug and liquor-related problems
  • Traffic congestion issues

The posters claimed that citizens had grown increasingly frustrated with these problems during BJP's governance. Notably, the posters featured a cross (X) mark superimposed on the lotus symbol, which represents the BJP in Indian politics.

Legal Violations and Police Action

The complainants highlighted that the posters violated specific legal provisions by failing to include the name of the printer or publisher, as mandated by law. Based on these complaints, Surat police registered five separate FIRs.

Police invoked several legal sections in their investigation:

  1. Section 336(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, which addresses forgery intended to harm someone's reputation
  2. Section 54 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  3. Sections 3 and 12 of the Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867, which require disclosure of printer and publisher information on printed materials

A joint statement issued by the offices of Sector-1 and Sector-2 additional police commissioners identified specific individuals allegedly involved in the incident. According to the statement, "During the intervening night of Saturday and Sunday, Kirit Pansuriya, Devsi Dhebariya, Chirag Navadiya, Vishal Chavda and 14 other unidentified persons allegedly put up posters in different parts of the city."

The police statement further noted that "The posters did not bear the name of the printer, and a cross mark was made on the symbol of a political party. The accused allegedly attempted to harm the party's reputation through forged posters."

Political Reactions and Protests

Following the registration of FIRs, workers of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) staged protests outside Varachha and Katargam police stations. This development adds another layer to the political tension in Surat as the city prepares for upcoming civic body elections.

The timing of this controversy is particularly significant, occurring just before the formal announcement of municipal elections. Political observers note that such incidents often intensify as election periods approach, with various parties attempting to influence public opinion through different means.

This poster controversy represents a significant development in Surat's political landscape, highlighting the intense competition expected in the forthcoming civic elections. The legal proceedings and political responses will likely continue to unfold as election preparations progress in the coming days.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration