Jana Sena Launches Internal Probe into MLA's Sexual Harassment Controversy
The Jana Sena party has taken decisive action in the escalating sexual harassment controversy involving its legislator, Arava Sreedhar, the MLA from Railway Kodur. On Wednesday, the party announced the formation of a three-member internal inquiry committee and directed the embattled lawmaker to abstain from all party activities until the investigation reaches its conclusion.
Composition and Mandate of the Inquiry Panel
The committee comprises three prominent party members: T. Sivashankar, Tamballapalli Ramadevi, and T.C. Varun. This panel has been entrusted with the critical task of examining all available media reports and related material concerning the allegations. Their objective is to conduct a thorough review and submit their findings at the earliest possible opportunity.
In a clear directive, the party leadership has instructed MLA Sreedhar to appear before this committee within a strict timeframe of seven days. He has been ordered to present his detailed explanation and version of events to the panel members for their consideration.
Detailed Allegations from the Accuser
The controversy gained significant momentum after Veena, a government employee, publicly accused MLA Sreedhar of sexual harassment. On Wednesday, she appeared before the media alongside her legal counsel, who declared their readiness to engage in a full-fledged legal battle to seek justice.
In a comprehensive social media post, Veena outlined a disturbing timeline of events. She alleged that her interactions with the MLA commenced on June 14, 2024, and gradually intensified in severity. Her accusations include:
- Misuse of his official position and power.
- Threats concerning her career prospects and professional future.
- Acts of intimidation and psychological pressure.
- An alleged physical assault on July 9, 2024.
- Subsequent pressure to terminate a pregnancy.
- Financial exploitation, with Veena claiming she lent the MLA ₹7 lakh.
Veena further stated that she continues to endure harassment and social isolation. She alleged there are ongoing attempts to influence the system to obstruct justice. In her appeal, she has sought legal protection and custody of her young son, emphasizing that her fight is for her dignity both as a woman and as a government employee.
Legal Steps and Counter-Allegations
Formal complaints have already been lodged with the Andhra Pradesh Director General of Police and the National Commission for Women. Veena's lawyer strongly refuted claims that the evidence presented was fabricated or generated using artificial intelligence. The counsel asserted that the evidence is genuine and would withstand any forensic scrutiny, stressing that the case is devoid of any political motivation.
Adding another layer to the controversy, the MLA's mother, Arava Pramila, addressed the media. She categorically denied all allegations against her son and claimed that the family had lodged formal complaints against Veena even before her accusations became public knowledge.
Police sources have confirmed that complaints from both parties are currently under active examination, indicating a complex legal situation is unfolding.
Political and Social Repercussions
The swift formation of the inquiry committee by the Jana Sena leadership highlights the serious political and social implications of the case. The party's directive for the MLA to stay away from activities underscores an attempt to manage the situation responsibly amidst growing public scrutiny. This case brings to the forefront critical issues of accountability, the safety of women, and the conduct of public representatives, setting a significant precedent in Andhra Pradesh's political landscape.
