The Haryana government is poised to challenge the Punjab and Haryana High Court's interim stay on its Stilt+4 policy in the Supreme Court. The policy, which permits the construction of four additional floors above the stilt parking in residential sectors, has been a subject of legal contention.
Background of the Policy
The Stilt+4 policy was introduced by the Haryana government to address the growing demand for housing in urban areas. It allows builders to construct up to four floors above the stilt parking, thereby increasing the floor area ratio (FAR) and enabling higher density development. The policy was particularly aimed at sectors in cities like Gurugram and Faridabad.
High Court Intervention
In response to petitions from residents' welfare associations and other stakeholders, the Punjab and Haryana High Court issued an interim stay on the implementation of the policy. The court raised concerns about the potential impact on infrastructure, including water supply, sewage, and road capacity, as well as the violation of building bylaws.
Government's Stand
The Haryana government argues that the policy is legally sound and has been formulated after due consideration of all factors. Officials maintain that the policy will help in optimizing land use and providing affordable housing options. The government is confident that the Supreme Court will uphold the policy, citing its benefits for urban development.
Implications of the Challenge
If the Supreme Court overturns the High Court's stay, it will pave the way for the implementation of the Stilt+4 policy across Haryana. This could lead to a surge in construction activity and potentially lower housing costs. However, opponents warn that it might strain existing infrastructure and lead to haphazard urban growth.
The legal battle is being closely watched by real estate developers, homebuyers, and urban planners. The Supreme Court's decision will have far-reaching consequences for urban housing policies in the state.
