Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal has written to a Delhi High Court judge, stating that he will not appear in the excise policy case either personally or through a lawyer. In his communication, Kejriwal has sought the recusal of Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma from hearing an appeal filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) against his discharge by a special court in February.
Background of the Case
The excise policy case pertains to alleged irregularities in the formulation and implementation of Delhi's excise policy for 2021-22. The CBI had challenged the trial court's order discharging Kejriwal, who was the deputy chief minister at the time, along with other accused. The special court had ruled that there was no prima facie evidence against the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader.
Kejriwal's Letter to the Judge
In his letter dated April 26, 2026, Kejriwal expressed his inability to appear before the court, citing personal reasons. He wrote, "I will not appear in this case either personally or through a lawyer. I have full faith in the judiciary but I am unable to participate in these proceedings." The letter further requested the judge to recuse herself from the matter, stating that he believes a fair hearing may not be possible under her bench.
Legal Implications
Legal experts have noted that Kejriwal's move is unusual. If a party refuses to appear, the court may proceed ex parte or appoint an amicus curiae. The CBI's appeal argues that the trial court erred in discharging Kejriwal, and the high court's decision will be crucial for the case's future. The matter is listed for hearing next week.
Kejriwal has consistently maintained his innocence, calling the case politically motivated. The AAP leader has faced multiple legal battles, including the excise policy case and a defamation suit, but this is the first time he has sought recusal of a judge in such a manner.
The Delhi High Court is yet to respond to Kejriwal's request. Meanwhile, political reactions have been mixed, with the ruling BJP accusing Kejriwal of evading the legal process, while AAP supporters claim it is a fight against a biased system.
