Former Indian cricketer Harbhajan Singh has moved the Punjab and Haryana High Court after the Punjab Police withdrew his security cover. The cricketer has sought immediate restoration of the security, citing threats to his life. In his petition, Harbhajan Singh argued that the withdrawal of security was arbitrary and without any valid reason, especially given the potential risks he faces.
Background of Security Withdrawal
The Punjab Police had withdrawn the security of Harbhajan Singh earlier this month, citing a review of threat perceptions. The decision came as a surprise to many, as the former off-spinner had been provided with security for several years due to perceived threats. The police claimed that the threat level had decreased, making the security cover unnecessary.
Harbhajan's Legal Challenge
In his plea before the High Court, Harbhajan Singh contended that the withdrawal was based on a flawed assessment. He emphasized that he continues to receive threats, especially in the context of his outspoken views on social and political issues. The cricketer's legal team argued that the state has a duty to protect its citizens, particularly public figures who may be at risk.
The High Court is expected to hear the matter soon. Harbhajan Singh has requested an interim order for the restoration of security until the court makes a final decision. The case highlights the ongoing debate about the security of public figures in India and the criteria used by law enforcement agencies to assess threats.
Reactions and Implications
The development has sparked discussions among political circles and the public. Some have supported Harbhajan Singh's move, stating that security should not be withdrawn arbitrarily. Others have questioned the need for continued security for former cricketers. The court's decision could set a precedent for how security cover is managed for public figures in the state.
Harbhajan Singh, who has represented India in 103 Test matches and 236 One Day Internationals, has been vocal on various issues, including farmer protests and political matters. His security was first provided after he received threats from extremist groups. The outcome of the case will be closely watched.
