The leadership of the prominent Church of South India (CSI) has issued a strong condemnation, accusing the central government of maintaining a deliberate and damaging silence regarding a series of targeted attacks on the Christian community across the country. The church body asserts that this silence from the Centre is effectively emboldening and supporting the perpetrators of these incidents.
Church Leadership Voices Grave Concern
In a significant statement, the CSI leadership expressed deep anguish and frustration over the perceived inaction from the highest levels of government. The church, which represents a substantial section of India's Christian population, highlighted that the continued silence from the Centre is not a neutral stance but one that indirectly aids those carrying out the assaults. This accusation marks a sharp escalation in the discourse surrounding the security and rights of minority communities in the nation.
The Core Allegation: Silence as Complicity
The central charge laid out by the church authorities is that the federal government's failure to publicly and unequivocally condemn the attacks creates an environment of impunity. When the state remains silent in the face of targeted violence, it is interpreted as a tacit approval or, at the very least, a lack of serious concern. This perceived vacuum of authoritative condemnation is seen as supporting the perpetrators, allowing them to operate without fear of swift legal or social repercussions. The statement implies that governance involves not just action but also the moral authority to speak out against injustice.
Context and Implications
The criticism was formally presented on 31 December 2025, as indicated in the original report. While the statement is national in its address to the Centre, the dateline of the news originates from Nagpur, a city with significant socio-political importance. This timing and location add layers to the narrative, suggesting the issue is pressing and widespread. The church's public stance is likely to resonate within interfaith dialogues and political discussions, potentially influencing public opinion and calling for more accountable governance. It underscores a growing demand for the protection of constitutional rights and the state's duty to safeguard all citizens equally.
The move by the CSI leadership is a clear call to action, urging the central government to break its silence, condemn the violence in unambiguous terms, and ensure robust mechanisms are in place to prevent further targeted attacks on the Christian community and uphold the secular fabric of the country.
