Five years after the historic revocation of Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir, prominent voices are raising critical questions about the path forward. Activist and commentator Sushil Pandit has spotlighted a pressing concern: while the legislative move was monumental, the absence of a clear, time-bound action plan is hindering real progress on the ground.
The Legislation Was Just the First Step
In a recent discussion, Pandit underscored that the abrogation of Article 370, passed by Parliament, was a necessary but insufficient step. He argues that legislation alone cannot automatically deliver the promised justice, lasting security, or enduring stability to the region. The true test, according to him, lies in what follows the bill's passage—the tangible implementation of a vision for Kashmir's future.
The date of January 5, 2026, marks a point of reflection years after the decision, with Pandit emphasizing the urgent need for a concrete government blueprint. This plan must focus on three critical pillars: effective governance, comprehensive rehabilitation of affected communities, and foolproof ground-level security. The current scenario, he suggests, lacks visible momentum in these crucial areas.
Where is the Concrete Action Plan?
Pandit's central critique hinges on the perceived gap between political symbolism and actionable strategy. He calls for a publicly outlined roadmap with defined milestones and accountability mechanisms. The question he poses is direct: Where is the detailed action plan that translates the constitutional change into everyday reality for the people of Jammu and Kashmir?
For real change to take root, Pandit stresses that consistent political will and meticulous execution are non-negotiable. He warns against complacency, noting that the region's development and national security interests depend on moving beyond the one-time act of revocation. The focus must now shift to sustained engagement, administrative efficiency, and ensuring that the benefits of integration reach every citizen.
The Call for Accountability and Execution
The commentary moves the discourse from 'what was done' to 'what is being done.' Pandit highlights that rehabilitation and development are processes requiring careful planning and relentless follow-through. Without an actionable framework and strict accountability, the historic decision risks remaining an incomplete promise.
In essence, Sushil Pandit's analysis serves as a crucial reminder that in Jammu and Kashmir, the challenge has now evolved from constitutional integration to effective administration and inclusive growth. The demand is for a clear, measurable plan of action that addresses ground realities and builds a secure, prosperous future for the region, fulfilling the broader objectives behind the move on Article 370.
