In a significant development, Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leaders Arvind Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia have refused to appear before the Delhi High Court in the excise policy case, escalating their protest against the judicial proceedings. Both leaders cited concerns over a potential conflict of interest involving Justice Swarna Kanta Sharma, claiming that her children are empanelled with the central government, which is represented by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta.
Leaders Cite Lack of Hope for Justice
Sisodia, following Kejriwal's lead, stated that he has “no hope for justice” and will instead follow the path of Satyagraha, a non-violent resistance approach. While maintaining respect for the judiciary, they questioned the fairness of the process, arguing that the judge's familial ties to the central government create an inherent bias. The development comes after their acquittal was challenged by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), intensifying the legal and political confrontation.
Background of the Case
The excise policy case revolves around allegations of irregularities in Delhi's excise policy formulation and implementation. Both Kejriwal and Sisodia were previously acquitted by a lower court, but the CBI appealed the decision, leading to the current hearing before Justice Sharma. The AAP leaders have consistently maintained their innocence, accusing the central government of using investigative agencies for political vendetta.
Implications and Reactions
The recusal of both leaders marks a dramatic turn in the case, potentially delaying proceedings further. Political analysts view this as a strategic move to highlight what AAP calls a biased judicial system. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has criticized the leaders for undermining the judiciary, while AAP supporters have rallied behind them. The Delhi High Court is yet to respond to the recusal request, and the case continues to draw national attention.
