In a significant verdict delivered on Thursday, a special court in Jhunjhunu district has convicted nine individuals in the high-profile murder case of former sarpanch Sardar Rao from Jurathanda village near Palsana in Sikar district. The court, operating under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, handed down life imprisonment to three accused and ten-year sentences to six others, marking a crucial development in a case that has drawn widespread attention.
Verdict Details and Sentences
The Special Judge, Renuka Hudda, pronounced the judgment after a thorough examination of extensive evidence, including testimonies from 76 witnesses, 235 exhibits, and 44 articles. Deputy Director of Prosecution Dilawar Singh confirmed that Hardevram, Arun, and Harvinder received life imprisonment for their roles in the crime. Meanwhile, Mukesh, Bhanu Pratap, Om Prakash Mund, Sunil, Kuldeep, and Narendra were each sentenced to 10 years in prison.
Notable Acquittals and Ongoing Searches
In a surprising turn, the court acquitted notorious gangster Lawrence Bishnoi and a co-accused, Yatendra, citing insufficient evidence to substantiate the charges against them. This aspect of the verdict has sparked discussions regarding the evidentiary standards in such cases.
Additionally, the proceedings revealed that one accused, Subhash Baral, remains at large, with police actively conducting searches to apprehend him. Another accused, Ankit Bhadu, died in a police encounter with the Punjab Police Special Team before the trial could commence, adding a layer of complexity to the case.
Background of the Murder
The tragic incident occurred on August 23, 2017, when former sarpanch Sardar Rao was shot dead in Palsana town. According to police reports, two shooters opened fire on him while he was seated at a local shop, leading to his immediate death at the scene. Authorities have linked the attack to electoral rivalry, suggesting that political tensions played a role in the motive behind the murder.
Court Proceedings and Security Measures
The verdict was delivered amid tight security, with additional police deployment on the court premises to ensure order. During the proceedings, eight accused were produced in person, while three were connected via video conferencing, reflecting the court's adaptation to modern logistical challenges.
The case was originally registered at the Ranoli police station based on a complaint filed by the victim's father, highlighting the personal and legal dimensions of this crime. This verdict not only brings a measure of justice to the victim's family but also underscores the judiciary's commitment to addressing atrocities under the SC/ST Act.
