Sabarimala Gold Theft: Former Devaswom President's Remand Extended by 14 Days
Sabarimala Gold Theft: Ex-Devaswom Chief's Remand Extended

Sabarimala Gold Theft Case: Former Devaswom President's Remand Extended

In a significant development in the Sabarimala gold theft case, the Kollam vigilance court has extended the remand of former devaswom president N Vasu. The court ordered a 14-day extension, keeping him in judicial custody.

Court Proceedings and Bail Rejection

N Vasu appeared before the vigilance court today as his previous remand period concluded. The court rejected his bail application, leading to his continued remand. This decision ensures he remains in custody while investigations proceed.

The vigilance court also addressed bail pleas from other accused individuals. Tanthri Kandararu Rajeevaru's bail application received a hearing on Monday. His legal team argued that the allegations in the Special Investigation Team's remand report were incorrect and bizarre. They strongly asserted his non-involvement in the gold theft.

Upcoming Hearings and SIT's Moves

The Special Investigation Team filed a custody application for the remanded Tanthri. The vigilance court will consider this application on Thursday. The SIT aims to conduct further questioning of Tanthri during this period.

Consequently, the court postponed Tanthri's bail plea to Thursday as well. This delay allows the SIT to present its case and seek additional custody if necessary.

Other Bail Applications in the Case

Meanwhile, the vigilance court will deliver its verdict on another bail application on Tuesday. Unnikrishnan Potti submitted this plea, citing that 90 days have passed since his arrest in the related Dwarapalaka sculpture case.

The Kollam vigilance court considered Potti's bail plea and postponed the verdict to Tuesday. Previously, the court rejected two bail applications submitted by Potti. This upcoming decision is crucial for his legal standing.

The Sabarimala gold theft case continues to unfold with these legal proceedings. The vigilance court's decisions will significantly impact the future course of the investigation and the accused individuals' custody status.