Rajkot Contractor Files Police Complaint Against Moneylender for Extortion and Threats
A serious case of alleged extortion and intimidation has emerged in Rajkot, where a 54-year-old government contractor has filed a formal complaint at the Malaviya Nagar police station. The complainant, Mohan Patel, has accused his acquaintance, Pratipalsinh Gohil, of engaging in coercive practices and issuing death threats over a loan dispute.
Details of the Loan and Alleged Extortion
According to the complaint, the financial relationship began in April 2023 when Patel borrowed Rs 1 lakh from Gohil to cover workers' salaries. This initial loan was repaid within a month. Subsequently, Patel borrowed an additional Rs 2.80 lakh in instalments from Gohil, with both parties agreeing to a monthly interest rate of 3%.
Patel stated that he paid Rs 8,400 as monthly interest for two months, adhering to the agreed terms. However, he alleged that Gohil unilaterally changed the conditions, demanding Rs 3,000 per day as interest. This drastic increase amounted to an exorbitant Rs 2.40 lakh per month, far exceeding the original principal of Rs 2.80 lakh.
Escalation of the Dispute and Threats
Despite the principal being only Rs 2.80 lakh, Patel claimed he has paid a total of Rs 18.50 lakh, including interest, to Gohil. The situation worsened when Gohil forcibly seized Patel's tractor, allegedly to pressure him into paying more money. When Patel attempted to retrieve his vehicle, he reported that Gohil threatened to kill him and his family over phone calls, escalating the matter to a severe level of intimidation.
Police Action and Legal Framework
In response to the complaint, the police have registered a case under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), including Sections 308(5), 352, 351(3), and 115(2). Additionally, relevant provisions of the Gujarat Money Lenders Act have been invoked to address the alleged illegal lending practices. This legal action underscores the seriousness of the allegations and the authorities' commitment to tackling financial exploitation and threats in the community.
The case highlights ongoing concerns about moneylending practices in Gujarat, emphasizing the need for vigilance and legal recourse in such disputes. As the investigation proceeds, it serves as a reminder of the protections available under state and national laws against extortion and harassment.
