Rajasthan High Court Upholds 2013 Disciplinary Action Against Judicial Officer
The Rajasthan High Court has dismissed a writ petition filed by a judicial officer challenging a punishment order dated August 5, 2013. The full court had imposed a penalty of stoppage of three annual grade increments due to the officer.
Background of the Disciplinary Case
The disciplinary action originated from allegations connected to two civil suits. In these cases, the petitioner's father, who is an advocate, was involved as a defendant in one suit and as counsel for defendants in the other.
According to the charges, the petitioner approached the presiding officer of the Court of Additional District Judge (Fast Track), Jaipur City, to interfere in the judicial proceedings. This act was deemed as misconduct and considered unbecoming of a judicial officer.
Court Proceedings and Arguments
Appearing for the registrar general of the Rajasthan High Court, a senior counsel stated that the enquiry judge found the charges proved in a report dated April 17, 2013. This report warranted the penalty that was subsequently imposed on August 5, 2013.
On the other hand, counsel for the petitioner argued that the case was baseless. They emphasized that the petitioner had maintained an unblemished service record since his appointment in 1996, highlighting his otherwise clean career.
Implications of the Dismissal
The dismissal of the writ petition reinforces the disciplinary measures taken by the full court. It underscores the judiciary's commitment to upholding ethical standards and accountability among judicial officers.
This ruling serves as a reminder of the strict conduct expected from those in judicial positions, ensuring the integrity of legal proceedings remains uncompromised.
