In a significant move against misconduct within the force, Pune Police Commissioner Amitesh Kumar has issued orders suspending a police constable for gross misuse of power. The constable stands accused of attempting to influence police stations to favour individuals connected to a local criminal gang.
Inquiry Uncovers Abuse of Authority
The suspension followed a detailed inquiry conducted by Deputy Commissioner of Police (Crime) Nikhil Pingale. This probe was initiated after serious allegations surfaced against the constable. The officer in question was familiar with the internal functioning of the Police Commissioner's office, including the protocols for issuing orders to police stations and senior inspectors. He allegedly exploited this knowledge for improper purposes.
Favouring Gang Affiliates and Meddling in Cases
According to the police findings, the suspended constable took requests from people affiliated with a city-based gang. These individuals asked him to contact local police officers and dissuade them from taking strict action against them. The constable complied, directly calling authorities at local police stations and instructing them not to act against the gang affiliates.
His interference was not limited to verbal instructions. The investigation revealed that the constable also meddled in multiple criminal cases registered at the Uttamnagar and Samarth police stations. This active intervention in ongoing investigations represents a severe breach of duty and legal procedure.
Zero-Tolerance Policy and Broader Implications
Commissioner Amitesh Kumar's decisive order underscores a zero-tolerance policy towards corruption and power abuse within the Pune Police. The case highlights the critical importance of internal accountability mechanisms. The swift inquiry by DCP Nikhil Pingale demonstrates the department's commitment to addressing such breaches internally before they undermine public trust.
This incident serves as a stern warning to personnel who might consider exploiting their position. It reinforces that familiarity with office procedures must be used to uphold the law, not to subvert it for personal or criminal gain. The suspension is likely to be followed by further departmental and possibly legal action as the details of the meddling are fully uncovered.
