The Karnataka High Court has taken a firm stance on the contentious Kogilu demolition issue, directing the state's Advocate General to submit a comprehensive affidavit detailing the government's actions and plans. The court's directive came during a hearing where the legal representative of the state presented crucial information regarding the future of the affected residents.
Court's Directive to the State Advocate General
During the proceedings, the bench explicitly instructed Advocate General (AG) Shashikiran Shetty to prepare and file a detailed sworn statement. This affidavit is expected to outline the sequence of events, the legal basis for the demolition drive, and the measures undertaken for the welfare of the displaced individuals. The court emphasized the need for transparency and accountability in dealing with the sensitive matter of displacement.
State's Plan for Temporary Relocation
In his submission to the court, AG Shashikiran Shetty provided a significant update on the government's relief strategy. He informed the honorable court that the state administration has proactively identified three separate areas to serve as temporary housing for the residents impacted by the demolition activities in Kogilu. This move is aimed at providing immediate shelter and reducing hardship while more permanent solutions are deliberated.
The revelation of earmarked relocation zones marks a pivotal development in the case, shifting the focus from the demolition itself to the rehabilitation process. The court has noted the submission and will likely scrutinize the suitability and facilities of these proposed temporary sites in subsequent hearings.
Implications and Next Steps
The High Court's intervention underscores the judiciary's role in ensuring that executive actions, especially those affecting citizens' homes, follow due process and are accompanied by robust rehabilitation plans. The demand for a detailed affidavit compels the state government to formally document its rationale and roadmap, making the process more subject to judicial review.
The next phase of the legal battle will hinge on the contents of the state's affidavit, which must be filed as per the court's directions. Stakeholders and residents await clarity on:
- The specific locations of the three temporary relocation areas.
- The timeline for shifting residents to these sites.
- The amenities and infrastructure promised at the temporary shelters.
- The long-term plan for permanent resettlement or compensation.
The case, which has drawn significant public attention, is set for further hearing, with the court maintaining oversight on the relief and rehabilitation measures promised by the Advocate General on behalf of the Karnataka government.
