High Court Intervenes to Protect Rohtak's Green Cover, Questions Massive Tree Felling
In a significant environmental intervention, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has taken a firm stand against the proposed cutting of approximately 12,000 trees in Rohtak city, Haryana. The court's decisive action came during a hearing on Wednesday, where it expressed deep concern over the environmental implications of such large-scale deforestation.
Court's Stern Warning and Immediate Restraint Order
The division bench, comprising Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Sanjiv Berry, did not mince words while addressing the authorities. "Why are you cutting these trees within Rohtak itself? You don't want your children or your grandchildren to survive?" the bench questioned, highlighting the long-term ecological consequences. The court immediately restrained the Haryana government from proceeding with any further tree cutting on a 38-acre green patch in Rohtak's proposed Sector 6.
Jurisdictional Questions and NGT Referral Consideration
In a notable development, the court raised important questions about the appropriate forum for hearing this environmental matter. "You are raising an environmental issue. Why can't you go to NGT? You will have to satisfy this court about that," observed the bench. The court has specifically asked the petitioner to provide:
- Clarification on whether the matter should be referred to the National Green Tribunal (NGT)
- Information about the High Court's jurisdiction to hear environmental cases
- Any relevant Supreme Court judgments or legal precedents on the subject
Background of the Controversial Development Project
The petition revealed troubling details about the proposed development:
- The land was originally acquired in 2002 for commercial exploitation but remained unused for over two decades
- During this period, a substantial natural forest developed across approximately 5 hectares
- The petitioner presented photographic evidence showing that tree cutting had already commenced
- Allegations suggest this activity began without obtaining mandatory clearance from central authorities as required under the Forest Conservation Act, 1980
Court's Demands and Future Proceedings
The High Court has issued specific directives to the state authorities:
- To place on record all permissions granted for tree felling in the area
- To maintain complete restraint from any further tree cutting until further orders
- To provide comprehensive documentation supporting their actions
The matter has been adjourned for February, giving all parties time to prepare their submissions. While the official copy of the order was not released at the time of reporting, the court's strong stance sends a clear message about prioritizing environmental protection over commercial development.
Broader Environmental Implications
This case represents more than just a local dispute; it highlights the ongoing tension between urban development and environmental conservation in rapidly growing Indian cities. The court's intervention underscores the legal system's increasing role in protecting natural resources and ensuring sustainable development practices. The outcome of this case could set important precedents for how similar environmental conflicts are handled across the region.
