The Delhi High Court on Wednesday expressed strong disapproval of Indian Railways for its failure to submit a formal response nearly a year after being directed to do so concerning a deadly stampede at the New Delhi railway station. The tragic incident, which occurred on February 15, 2025, resulted in the loss of 18 lives and left 15 individuals injured.
Court's Stern Rebuke to Railway Authorities
An annoyed bench comprising Chief Justice D K Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia did not mince words while addressing the lapse. The court highlighted that the railways' highest law officer, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, had appeared before it when the public interest litigation (PIL) was initially filed and had given assurances on behalf of the organization. "Do not take the court for granted. What is this? We required you to file an affidavit (by March 26, 2025). What did you do?" the bench questioned. The judges pointed out that the appearance seemed to be merely a tactic to "sail through the pressure at that moment."
Emphasizing the gravity of the delay, the bench added, "It has been a year by now and you were not able to file that affidavit. What does this indicate? We do not appreciate this." The court also raised a critical concern, wondering aloud if the authorities had become "so lax" that they were passively "waiting for another accident to happen."
Background of the Stampede and PIL
The fatal crush took place as thousands of passengers were waiting to board trains headed for Prayagraj, where the Maha Kumbh was being held. The PIL was filed by a social organization named Arth Vidhi, which argued that the stampede exposed "gross mismanagement" and a systemic failure on the part of the administration.
Following a suggestion from Solicitor General Tushar Mehta during earlier proceedings, the High Court had, on February 19, 2025, asked the railways to examine several crucial issues before filing its affidavit. These issues included:
- Fixing the maximum passenger capacity for each coach.
- Addressing the perennial problem of overcrowding at stations.
- Evaluating the policy of limiting the sale of platform tickets.
Railways Seek More Time, Court Grants Final Chance
During the hearing on Wednesday, the counsel representing the railways requested additional time to finally submit the affidavit. The lawyer assured the court that comprehensive measures were being implemented, such as the creation of designated holding areas on platforms to better manage crowds.
Taking note of the submission, the court granted a final extension of four weeks to the railways. It directed the authorities to file detailed information on the "up-to-date steps" taken specifically concerning the issues of overcrowding and crowd control mechanisms across stations. This directive underscores the court's insistence on tangible action rather than mere promises.
The ongoing case continues to spotlight the urgent need for systemic reforms in crowd management and safety protocols within one of the world's largest railway networks, especially during major religious gatherings and peak travel seasons.
