In a strong move to uphold judicial authority, the Madras High Court has ordered a government official in Salem district to construct a girls' toilet at a local school using his personal funds. This directive comes as a penalty for being found guilty of contempt of court.
Court Takes Stern Action for Disobedience
The case involves Nagoor Meerasa, the tahsildar of Kadaiyampatti taluk in Salem district. Justice P T Asha passed this unique order while hearing a contempt petition filed against him. The petition was moved for Meerasa's failure to implement a court order issued earlier in 2024.
The original order pertained to a plea by M Roja, concerning the issuance of a patta (land title document). The tahsildar's inaction in complying with this order led to the contempt proceedings.
"Majesty of the Court" Cannot Be Ignored
Justice Asha expressed strong disapproval of the official's conduct. The court noted that even according to the contemnor's own affidavit, court orders were being given the "last priority."
"This court cannot sit back and permit the majesty and dignity of the court to be reduced to the level where even according to the contemnor's affidavit, orders of the court are given the last priority," the court stated emphatically.
Specifics of the Construction Order
The court's order is detailed and leaves no room for ambiguity regarding the task assigned as punishment. The tahsildar has been directed to undertake the following at the Panchayat Union Middle School in Kadaiyampatti, Salem:
- Demolish the existing dilapidated girls' toilet.
- Reconstruct a new, fully-equipped toilet facility.
The court specified that the new toilet must include specific amenities, ensuring it meets proper standards. The facilities must include one Indian closet, two European closets with hand faucets, and wash basins.
A Precedent for Accountability
This ruling underscores the judiciary's intent to enforce its orders strictly and creatively. By linking the penalty to a public welfare cause—improving sanitation infrastructure for schoolgirls—the court has sent a powerful message about accountability.
The order effectively holds the erring official personally responsible, both for his contempt and for contributing to a tangible social good. It sets a precedent that disobedience of court orders will have direct and consequential remedies.
