Eduquity Technologies Files ₹2.5 Crore Defamation Suit Against YouTuber Nitish Rajput
Eduquity Sues YouTuber Nitish Rajput for ₹2.5 Crore Defamation

Eduquity Technologies Files ₹2.5 Crore Defamation Lawsuit Against YouTuber Nitish Rajput

In a significant legal development, Eduquity Technologies, a Noida-based human resource consulting firm, has initiated a ₹2.5 crore defamation suit against prominent YouTuber Nitish Rajput. The lawsuit stems from a video published by Rajput several months ago, in which he raised serious concerns about the examination practices and vendor selection processes of the Staff Selection Commission (SSC).

Contentious Video Allegations and Legal Response

According to reports from Moneycontrol, Nitish Rajput's video scrutinized the SSC's tendering process and the selection of examination vendors, specifically targeting Eduquity Technologies. Rajput alleged discrepancies in the company's turnover over recent years and questioned the procedural integrity of large-scale competitive examinations administered by the SSC.

The YouTuber claimed his allegations were substantiated by Right to Information (RTI) replies and publicly available documents. In his detailed analysis, Rajput highlighted significant changes in rules and operational procedures, drawing attention to potential vulnerabilities in the examination system that could compromise fairness and transparency.

Eduquity Technologies has responded to these allegations with the defamation suit, seeking substantial damages for what it perceives as harmful and unsubstantiated claims against its business practices and reputation.

Who is Nitish Rajput?

Nitish Rajput is a 36-year-old digital influencer and content creator with a substantial following across multiple platforms. He boasts nearly 8.13 million subscribers on YouTube and approximately 3.5 million followers on Instagram. Born in Sultanpur, Uttar Pradesh, on October 4, 1989, Rajput grew up in Rudrapur before his family relocated to Delhi.

He holds a BTech degree in Information Technology from Gautam Buddha University in Uttar Pradesh. Beyond his social media presence, Rajput is the founder of Pinega Infosystem. His YouTube channel description emphasizes his belief in using online tools to inform, educate, and bring people together through factual, uncompromised information.

"Nitish Rajput firmly believes that there are adequate tools available online through which people can be brought together, informed, and educated collectively," states his profile. He aims to curate healthy, informative narratives that help people form opinions backed by verifiable facts.

Financial Profile and Recent Controversies

While Nitish Rajput's exact net worth remains undisclosed, industry experts estimate it to be between ₹86.79 crore and ₹127.92 crore (approximately $987,500 to $1.46 million). His income streams are diversified, with YouTube revenue being a major component, supplemented significantly by brand collaborations and sponsorship deals.

This is not the first time Rajput has faced international content restrictions. Last year, he revealed that his YouTube channel was blocked in Pakistan amid heightened tensions between India and Pakistan. He shared a screenshot on social media platform X with the caption, "Pakistan has blocked my YouTube in Pakistan."

Broader Implications for Digital Content and Corporate Accountability

This lawsuit raises important questions about the boundaries of digital journalism, corporate accountability, and freedom of expression in the online space. As influencers like Nitish Rajput increasingly use their platforms to critique institutional processes, the legal ramifications of such critiques become more pronounced.

The case also highlights the growing scrutiny of government tendering processes and vendor selection in public examinations, a topic of significant public interest given the high stakes involved for millions of aspirants across India.

The outcome of this defamation suit could set a precedent for how similar cases are handled in the future, balancing the right to free speech with protections against potentially damaging allegations made in the public domain.