Delhi HC Petition Seeks Stay on Manoj Bajpayee's Netflix Film Ghooskhor Pandat Over Defamation Allegations
Delhi HC Petition Seeks Stay on Manoj Bajpayee's Netflix Film

Delhi High Court Petition Challenges Release of Manoj Bajpayee's Netflix Film Ghooskhor Pandat

A significant legal challenge has emerged in the Delhi High Court, where a writ petition has been filed seeking an immediate stay on the release and streaming of the upcoming Netflix film Ghooskhor Pandat, starring acclaimed actor Manoj Bajpayee. The petitioner, Mahender Chaturvedi, alleges that the film's title and content are defamatory and communally offensive, specifically targeting the Brahmin community.

Petitioner's Allegations and Legal Grounds

The petition, filed through Advocate Vineet Jindal, contends that the term "Pandat" is historically associated with scholarship, ethical conduct, and spiritual guidance within Indian society. However, the promotional material for the film, which features Bajpayee as an errant cop nicknamed Pandat, allegedly links this term with corruption and bribery. This portrayal, according to the petitioner, harms the dignity and reputation of the Brahmin community and violates fundamental rights under Articles 14, 21, and 25 of the Constitution.

Mahender Chaturvedi, who describes himself as an Acharya devoted to Indian scriptures and philosophy, claims to be directly aggrieved by the film. He argues that such content amounts to stereotyping and vilification of a religious and social group, infringing on their right to dignity and cultural identity.

Constitutional and Regulatory Concerns

While acknowledging the right to freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a), the plea emphasizes that this right is subject to reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2). It asserts that the film's content does not extend to hate speech, defamation, or material that could disturb communal harmony and public order. The petitioner has also criticized the Union Government for failing to establish an effective regulatory mechanism for OTT platforms, alleging that such gaps enable platforms to promote sensational content for commercial gain.

The petition seeks several reliefs, including:

  • Issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct authorities to intervene and restrain the streaming of the film.
  • An interim order to stay the release during the pendency of the case.
  • Directions to the Union Government to take action against Netflix India under applicable laws governing digital platforms.
  • Any other orders deemed fit in the interest of justice, equity, and communal harmony.

Background and Urgency of the Petition

Netflix announced Ghooskhor Pandat during its Next on Netflix 2026 event in Mumbai, with promotional materials circulating on social media platforms like Twitter. The petitioner argues that the cause of action arose upon this announcement and promotion, and any damage from the film's release would be irreversible. Therefore, urgent judicial intervention is sought prior to the streaming of the film, which is scheduled to be available soon on Netflix.

This case highlights ongoing debates in India about the balance between creative freedom and community sensitivities, particularly in the rapidly evolving digital entertainment landscape. It also raises questions about regulatory oversight for OTT platforms and the protection of constitutional rights in the face of alleged defamation.