A Delhi court has granted the National Investigation Agency (NIA) an extended period of custody for two individuals arrested in connection with the 2021 Red Fort blast case. This decision allows investigators more time to interrogate the accused and unravel the broader conspiracy behind the security breach at the historic monument.
Court Grants Extended Custody for Deeper Probe
The order was passed by Special Judge Shailendra Malik of the Patiala House Courts. The two accused, whose custody has been extended, are alleged to be part of a terror module linked to Jammu and Kashmir. The NIA had sought their extended remand, arguing that they needed to be confronted with recovered digital evidence and to investigate their connections with handlers based across the border.
The explosive blast occurred on the evening of January 14, 2021, just days before Republic Day celebrations. It caused damage to a building inside the Red Fort complex, a UNESCO World Heritage Site and a symbol of national pride. While no injuries were reported, the incident raised serious concerns about security at high-profile locations in the national capital.
Investigation Focuses on Module and International Links
The NIA, which took over the case from the Delhi Police, has been investigating the involvement of a newly floated terrorist outfit. The agency's probe suggests the accused were in contact with Pakistan-based operatives who provided them with instructions and logistical support. The extended custody is crucial for investigators to piece together the entire sequence of events, from planning to execution.
Key areas of investigation during the extended remand period include:
- Detailed analysis of financial transactions used to fund the operation.
- Forensic examination of digital devices and communication trails.
- Identifying all individuals involved in the logistical support network within India.
- Establishing the complete chain of command leading to the handlers abroad.
The agency has previously stated that the module aimed to disrupt the Republic Day festivities and create a climate of fear. The recovery of explosive materials and the manner of the blast indicated a planned terrorist act rather than an accidental explosion.
Legal Proceedings and National Security Implications
This case underscores the persistent threats to national security from cross-border terror modules. The extension of NIA custody reflects the court's acknowledgment of the complexity of the investigation, which spans multiple regions and involves digital and financial forensics. The accused face serious charges under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and the Explosive Substances Act.
The next hearing in the matter is expected to follow the conclusion of the current remand period, where the NIA will present its findings. The outcome of this investigation is being closely watched, as it has significant implications for the security apparatus and counter-terrorism strategies in urban centers.
Legal experts point out that such extensions are not uncommon in terror-related cases where the agency must corroborate evidence from multiple sources to build a watertight case for prosecution. The focus remains on ensuring that all perpetrators, both within the country and abroad, are brought to justice.
