The legal case between Ben Pasternak and Evelyn Ha has become a major topic online. The couple ended their relationship on March 31, 2026, after a reported altercation at a hotel in New York. Weeks later, Pasternak was arrested and charged with serious crimes, including second-degree strangulation and assault.
Pasternak has pleaded not guilty to all charges. His legal team claims he acted in self-defense. The case is now moving toward court, with a hearing scheduled for June.
Pasternak Speaks Out
After remaining silent for days, Pasternak released a video on April 26, 2026. In it, he denied ever beating Ha, stating that things are not always as they seem. He argued that throughout their relationship, he was the one being abused. His response quickly spread online, with many people reacting to both sides. Now, the situation has become a complex case with strong claims from both parties.
Key Denials and Counterclaims
In his video, Pasternak clearly denied the main accusation. He said, “I have never strangled anyone in my entire life. I’m not physically aggressive… most people would describe me as super gentle.” He also claimed that Ha was abusive toward him during their relationship.
Pasternak stated that Ha would hit and scratch him, and that this was known to people around them. He added, “She was physical with me and this was an open secret among her sisters and my friends.” He even mentioned that a couples therapist was aware of these issues and had suggested serious measures like a restraining order.
He also claimed there is evidence to support his side, including medical reports, photos of injuries, and letters from Ha’s past partners. He said, “There’s a lot of documentation… it’s not going anywhere except to court.”
Legal Proceedings Ahead
Both sides have made serious allegations, and the truth will likely emerge during the legal process. Pasternak has pleaded not guilty, and the court will examine all evidence before making any decisions.
This case highlights the complexity that can arise in personal relationships. Since each party presents their own story, the outcome will depend on which side provides sufficient evidence to convince the judge. For now, everyone awaits the next developments.
