Kanpur Court Grants Bail to Accused Shivam Mishra in High-Profile Lamborghini Crash Case
A court in Uttar Pradesh has granted bail to accused Shivam Mishra, merely hours after his dramatic arrest in connection with a serious Lamborghini crash on Kanpur's VIP Road that left three individuals injured. Mishra was released on a personal bond of Rs 20,000, sparking significant legal and public interest in the unfolding case.
Swift Arrest and Bail Proceedings
Police had arrested Shivam Mishra on Thursday, linking him directly to the accident that occurred on Sunday afternoon. He was promptly produced before the court for legal proceedings. This arrest came despite earlier claims from his father, prominent tobacco businessman KK Mishra, who insisted his son was in Delhi receiving medical treatment. Authorities, however, apprehended him from Kanpur itself, highlighting discrepancies in the initial narrative.
Controversy Over Driver Identity
The core of the case has intensely centred on determining who was actually driving the luxury Lamborghini at the precise moment of the crash. In a detailed application filed by Shivam Mishra's legal representative, it was strongly asserted that the vehicle was being operated by his driver, Mohan M., a resident of Dwarka in Delhi, on the day of the unfortunate incident.
Contrastingly, the official police report submitted to the court clearly stated that Mohan was not listed as an accused in the case. Investigators informed the court that their ongoing investigation had revealed substantial evidence indicating the car was driven by Shivam Mishra himself on the day of the accident, directly contradicting the defence's claims.
Court Rejects Driver's Surrender Application
The court of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate VII had earlier firmly rejected Mohan’s surrender application. While Mohan's lawyer attempted to accept responsibility for the crime on his client's behalf and presented an agreement dated February 8 between the complainant, Mo. Taufiq, and Mohan in court, the prosecution argued effectively that since Mohan's name was not even mentioned in the case records, there was absolutely no legal necessity for him to surrender.
The agreement stated that a resolution had been reached between the two parties, with Mohan covering all medical treatment expenses, which satisfied Mo. Taufiq who expressed no desire for further action. It was emphasized that this agreement was made without any external pressure. After meticulously hearing both sides and thoroughly reviewing the police report, the court decisively rejected Mohan's surrender application.
Legal Battle and Vehicle Examination
Regarding the damaged Lamborghini, the court has sought a comprehensive technical examination report from the police before making any decision on its release. An application was also formally filed by the car owner’s lawyer seeking the vehicle’s return. Police confirmed that a detailed technical examination would be conducted by the Regional Transport Office (RTO). The court directed the owner to present all vehicle documents to the investigating officer and instructed police to submit the technical examination report promptly for further judicial consideration.
Defence Plans Revision Petition
Dharmendra Singh, Mohan's lawyer, stated emphatically, "Driver Mohan was driving the car. The agreement was also shown in court, but police are wrongly implicating Shivam. Based on the police report, the court has rejected Mohan's surrender application. We will file a revision petition in the District Judge's court against the order," indicating that the legal battle is far from over and may escalate to higher judicial forums.
