Bangladesh Awami League Rejects Election as 'Planned Farce', Demands Fresh Polls
Awami League Rejects Bangladesh Election as 'Planned Farce'

Bangladesh Awami League Denounces Parliamentary Election as 'Well-Planned Farce'

The Bangladesh Awami League has issued a scathing rejection of the country's recent parliamentary election, labeling the entire electoral process a 'well-planned farce' that fundamentally disregarded democratic principles and constitutional norms. The party's condemnation came in an official statement released on Sunday following the conclusion of polling and the commencement of vote counting.

Allegations of Systematic Electoral Manipulation

In their detailed statement, the Awami League outlined what they described as systematic manipulation beginning on the evening of February 11th. According to the party, the farcical nature of the polling was evident through multiple irregularities including the seizure of polling centers, incidents of gunfire, widespread distribution of cash to influence voters, organized vote-buying schemes, unauthorized stamping of ballots, and election agents signing result sheets without any actual voter participation.

The party expressed particular gratitude to Bangladeshi citizens—including mothers, sisters, and minority communities—for what they characterized as rejecting this 'voter-less' election through their absence from polling stations.

Alarmingly Low Voter Turnout Figures

Official statistics from the Election Commission revealed that by 11 AM on February 12th, merely 14.96% of eligible voters had participated in the electoral process—a strikingly low figure recorded just three and a half hours into voting. Numerous polling stations, especially those located in Dhaka and other major urban areas, reportedly witnessed no voter presence whatsoever throughout the day.

The Awami League further highlighted what they termed 'abnormal increases' in registered voter numbers within specific constituencies, particularly in the capital region, raising serious questions about the legitimacy of the electoral rolls and the integrity of the entire process.

Pre-Election Intimidation and Coercion

In the days leading up to the election, the party documented continuous intimidation tactics targeting their supporters, prospective voters, and minority communities. These alleged actions included systematic arrests, physical attacks, and various forms of coercion designed to force compliance with the electoral process.

Despite these reported threats and pressures, the Awami League noted that voters overwhelmingly chose to stay away from polling centers, resulting in what they described as effectively empty voting locations across the country.

Comprehensive List of Demands

In response to what they perceive as a fundamentally flawed electoral exercise, the Awami League has presented a comprehensive set of demands:

  1. Immediate cancellation of the recently concluded parliamentary election
  2. Resignation of Chief Advisor Muhammad Yunus from his position
  3. Unconditional release of all political prisoners including journalists, teachers, and intellectuals
  4. Withdrawal of all false cases filed against political opponents
  5. Revocation of restrictions imposed on Awami League activities

The party has called for the organization of fresh, free, fair, and inclusive elections conducted under the supervision of a neutral caretaker government to restore what they describe as the fundamental voting rights of Bangladeshi citizens.

Broader Political Context

This election marked the first parliamentary contest following the tenure of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, occurring amidst reported clashes involving the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) and Jamaat-e-Islami, incidents of violence, and the historically low voter participation that characterized the electoral process.

The Awami League's forceful rejection of the election results and their detailed allegations of systematic manipulation represent a significant escalation in Bangladesh's ongoing political tensions, raising serious questions about the country's democratic trajectory and the legitimacy of its governing institutions.