In a revealing episode of Times Mantra that aired on November 19, 2025, at 07:44 PM IST, prominent investigator Umang Taneja tackled one of India's most controversial topics: the real capabilities and limitations of astrology. The session provided a logical, evidence-based examination of whether celestial bodies can genuinely predict future events or if people are being systematically misled by dramatic claims.
The Delhi Blast Prediction Controversy
Taneja specifically addressed the circulating rumors about astrological predictions concerning Delhi blasts. He systematically broke down why such claims lack credibility and scientific backing. The investigator explained how fake astrologers often exploit public fear following tragic events by claiming they had foreseen them, using vague language and selective memory to create an illusion of accuracy.
These predictions typically surface after events occur, with practitioners cherry-coincidences and ambiguous statements that seem prophetic only in hindsight. Taneja emphasized that no credible evidence exists showing any astrologer accurately predicted specific disasters like the Delhi incidents before they happened.
The Psychology Behind Astrological Deception
Taneja exposed the psychological tactics employed by fraudulent astrological practitioners. Fear, ambiguity, and coincidence form the trifecta of their deceptive strategies. These fake gurus use generalized statements that could apply to anyone (known as the Barnum effect) while creating an atmosphere of anxiety that keeps clients returning for more guidance and solutions.
The episode particularly focused on the misunderstood nature of Shani (Saturn), often portrayed as a cruel planet in popular astrology. Taneja explored how different traditions interpret Shani's influence and why the planet has gained such a fearsome reputation, suggesting that much of this perception stems from misinterpretation rather than authentic astrological principles.
The Truth About Daily Horoscopes
One of the most enlightening segments addressed why generic daily horoscopes seem accurate for everyone. Taneja decoded the psychological mechanisms that make vague, personality-oriented statements feel personally relevant. This phenomenon, known as subjective validation, explains why millions of people read their horoscopes and find them surprisingly accurate despite their generic nature.
The comprehensive analysis separated myth from reality throughout the episode, providing viewers with logical tools to distinguish between genuine spiritual guidance and exploitative practices. Taneja's approach was firmly rooted in critical thinking and evidence-based examination rather than outright dismissal of all astrological traditions.
The timing of this episode is particularly relevant given India's growing conversation about spiritual authenticity versus commercial exploitation. As Taneja presented his findings, he encouraged viewers to approach astrological claims with healthy skepticism and to question predictions that seem designed to provoke fear rather than provide genuine guidance.
