Punjab Government Under Fire: HC Demands Answers on Gallantry Award Allowance Withdrawal
Punjab HC Seeks Explanation on Gallantry Allowance Withdrawal

The Punjab & Haryana High Court has delivered a stern message to the Punjab government, demanding a comprehensive explanation for its controversial decision to withdraw financial allowances from gallantry award recipients. This move has sparked widespread concern among the state's decorated military personnel and their families.

Court Takes Serious Note of Allowance Cancellation

During a recent hearing, the bench expressed deep concern over the state government's unilateral decision to discontinue the monthly financial allowance provided to recipients of prestigious gallantry awards. The court has given the Punjab administration a strict deadline to submit a detailed response explaining the rationale behind this controversial move.

Impact on War Heroes and Their Families

The withdrawn allowance represented crucial financial support for many gallantry award winners, including those honored with the Shaurya Chakra and other distinguished military decorations. For numerous veterans and their families, this financial assistance was more than just monetary support—it symbolized the nation's gratitude for their extraordinary bravery and sacrifice.

Legal Battle for Recognition and Rights

The case reached the High Court through a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by concerned citizens and military welfare advocates. The petitioners argued that withdrawing these benefits disrespects the sacrifices made by military personnel and undermines the significance of gallantry awards.

What This Means for Punjab's Military Community

The court's intervention highlights the ongoing tension between fiscal management and honoring military commitments. As the state government prepares its response, the military community across Punjab watches closely, hoping for a favorable resolution that respects their service and sacrifices.

The next hearing is scheduled for four weeks, giving the government adequate time to prepare its defense or reconsider the controversial decision that has drawn criticism from various quarters.