Congress Slams India-US Trade Framework as 'Surrender' to American Interests
Congress Criticizes India-US Trade Deal as 'Surrender'

Congress Leaders Decry India-US Trade Framework as 'Surrender' to American Demands

The Congress party launched a scathing attack on Saturday against the recently announced India-US trade deal interim framework, labeling it a "surrender" of Indian economic interests. Senior party figures expressed deep concerns about the agreement's implications for domestic agriculture and the broader trade relationship between the two nations.

Commerce Minister's Statement Called 'Too Clever by Half'

Congress leaders specifically targeted Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal's statements regarding agricultural imports, describing them as "too clever by half." The criticism stems from the joint statement's mention of a list of products for which India would eliminate or reduce tariffs, including a vague reference to "additional products."

Congress MP Jairam Ramesh highlighted this ambiguity, noting that the "additional products" category remains unspecified. "This open-ended approach raises serious questions about what is being concealed from public scrutiny," Ramesh stated. He warned that significant concerns would likely emerge as more detailed information about the framework becomes available.

Former Finance Minister Questions Agreement's Nature

Former Finance Minister P Chidambaram offered a technical critique of the arrangement, clarifying that India and the United States have not actually reached a formal trade agreement. "This isn't even an interim agreement," Chidambaram explained. "It's merely a framework for what might become an interim agreement in the future."

Chidambaram went further in his assessment, stating unequivocally: "One thing is clear: The framework deal is heavily tilted in favor of the United States, and the asymmetry between the two nations' positions is obvious to anyone examining the details."

Congress Spokesperson Warns of Farmer Impact

Congress spokesman Pawan Khera issued one of the most dramatic warnings about the framework's potential consequences. He alleged that the deal would "break farmers' backs in the future" by exposing Indian agriculture to unfair competition from American imports without adequate safeguards.

The Congress party's unified criticism reflects broader concerns about:

  • The lack of transparency regarding which products would face reduced tariffs
  • The perceived imbalance favoring American economic interests
  • Potential negative impacts on India's agricultural sector and farmers
  • The framework's ambiguous legal and economic status

As the debate over the India-US trade relationship intensifies, these criticisms from the main opposition party are likely to shape political discourse around international trade policy in the coming months.