Surat Builders Association Raises Concerns Over SMC's Penalty Practices
Surat Builders Question SMC's Penalty Focus on Private Developers

Surat Builders Association Raises Concerns Over SMC's Penalty Practices

The Surat Builders Association (SDA) has formally addressed Mayor Daxesh Mavani, highlighting what they describe as an unfair penalty system implemented by the Surat Municipal Corporation (SMC). According to the association, the SMC consistently penalises private real estate developers while allegedly overlooking similar infractions by larger construction firms involved in significant government projects.

Focus on Major Infrastructure Projects

The SDA pointed out that several high-profile projects are currently underway in Surat, including the Surat Metro Rail Network, various development works managed by the SMC itself, and the construction of government buildings. The association noted that while these projects are in progress, there have been reported lapses and violations at these sites. However, the SDA claims that the firms responsible for these major projects have not faced penalties, creating a disparity in enforcement.

Impact on Small and Midsize Builders

In their communication, the SDA, which operates under the Confederation of Real Estate Developers' Associations of India (CREDAI) with Jignesh Patel as its Surat president, urged the SMC authorities to adopt a more lenient approach towards small and midsize builders. The association emphasized that the current crackdown is particularly detrimental during what they describe as the peak season for construction, where meeting project deadlines is crucial for business sustainability and economic growth in the region.

Call for Balanced Enforcement

The builders' body has requested that the SMC reconsider its penalty practices to ensure a fair and equitable treatment of all construction entities, regardless of their size. They argue that while accountability is essential, the focus should not disproportionately burden private developers, especially when larger firms involved in public projects appear to operate with impunity. This issue raises broader questions about governance and transparency in urban development initiatives within Gujarat.