A year after the tragic Air India crash, some bereaved families continue to question the compensation clause, with a few declining the airline's 'full and final' settlement offer.
Families Decline Settlement
Satish Jha, a relative of one of the victims, is among those who have refused the compensation package. He argues that the clause does not adequately address the loss and suffering endured by the families. The airline's offer, termed 'full and final', would waive any further claims, leaving families with no recourse for additional compensation or accountability.
Questions Over Fairness
The families contend that the compensation is insufficient, given the scale of the tragedy and the long-term impact on their lives. They are calling for a transparent review of the compensation formula, which they believe undervalues human life and ignores non-economic damages such as emotional trauma and loss of companionship.
Legal and Emotional Battle
Legal experts note that while airlines often offer settlements to avoid prolonged litigation, the 'full and final' clause can be coercive for grieving families. The victims' kin are now seeking legal avenues to challenge the terms, demanding that Air India and regulatory bodies address their concerns.
As the first anniversary of the crash approaches, the families remain united in their quest for justice, hoping to set a precedent for fair compensation in future aviation disasters.
